BUG #14626: array_agg( anyarray ) unexpected error with multi-valued single-dimension array
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 14626
Logged by: David Johnston
Email address: david.g.johnston@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.5.6
Operating system: Ubuntu 14.04
Description:
In short...
This works:
SELECT array_agg(CASE WHEN a = ARRAY[]::text[] THEN ARRAY['N/A']::text[]
ELSE a END)
FROM ( VALUES (1, ARRAY[]::text[]), (1, ARRAY['1']::text[]) ) vals (v, a);
This doesn't, and should since the number of elements in the non-empty array
shouldn't change the dimensionality logic.
SELECT array_agg(CASE WHEN a = ARRAY[]::text[] THEN ARRAY['N/A']::text[]
ELSE a END)
FROM ( VALUES (1, ARRAY[]::text[]), (1, ARRAY['1','2']::text[]) ) vals (v,
a)
David J.
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
david.g.johnston@gmail.com writes:
This doesn't, and should since the number of elements in the non-empty array
shouldn't change the dimensionality logic.
SELECT array_agg(CASE WHEN a = ARRAY[]::text[] THEN ARRAY['N/A']::text[]
ELSE a END)
FROM ( VALUES (1, ARRAY[]::text[]), (1, ARRAY['1','2']::text[]) ) vals (v,
a)
Why do you think that should work? You're asking array_agg to accumulate
a 1-D length-1 array and then a 1-D length-2 array. There's no way to
make a rectangular 2-D array out of that, except perhaps by inventing
entries which isn't in array_agg's charter.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
david.g.johnston@gmail.com writes:
This doesn't, and should since the number of elements in the non-empty
array
shouldn't change the dimensionality logic.
SELECT array_agg(CASE WHEN a = ARRAY[]::text[] THEN ARRAY['N/A']::text[]
ELSE a END)
FROM ( VALUES (1, ARRAY[]::text[]), (1, ARRAY['1','2']::text[]) ) vals(v,
a)
Why do you think that should work? You're asking array_agg to accumulate
a 1-D length-1 array and then a 1-D length-2 array. There's no way to
make a rectangular 2-D array out of that, except perhaps by inventing
entries which isn't in array_agg's charter.
I was being too narrow-minded in interpreting the word dimension.
SELECT array_ndims(ARRAY['1','2']::text[]); => 1; therefore it is a one
dimensional array - having a length of 2. One can, and we do in other
places, define that array as having a dimension of 1x2.
SELECT '{{N/A},{1,2}}'::text[] --> fails with "sub-arrays with matching
dimensions"...
Apparently the annoyance I posted on the other thread isn't so simple to
resolve - just having an empty "1-dimensional" array is not particularly
useful given the length dimension must also match.
This helps explain why my first attempt:
SELECT array_dims('{1,2}'::text[]); --> yields [1:2] which is what is being
keyed off here.
All this and all I really want is a friggin' "array_append / array_concat"
aggregate function that accepts either scalars or matching "primary
dimension" arrays - and treats empty arrays as no-ops.
David J.
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:32 PM, David G. Johnston <
david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
david.g.johnston@gmail.com writes:
This doesn't, and should since the number of elements in the non-empty
array
shouldn't change the dimensionality logic.
SELECT array_agg(CASE WHEN a = ARRAY[]::text[] THEN ARRAY['N/A']::text[]
ELSE a END)
FROM ( VALUES (1, ARRAY[]::text[]), (1, ARRAY['1','2']::text[]) ) vals(v,
a)
Why do you think that should work? You're asking array_agg to accumulate
a 1-D length-1 array and then a 1-D length-2 array. There's no way to
make a rectangular 2-D array out of that, except perhaps by inventing
entries which isn't in array_agg's charter.
All this and all I really want is a friggin' "array_append / array_concat"
aggregate function that accepts either scalars or matching "primary
dimension" arrays - and treats empty arrays as no-ops.
In the end I realized that serializing the arrays to text would work just
fine. The extra I/O for converting from and to an actual array type is
immaterial in my situation. It still doesn't remove my actual desire for
an aggregate array_concat type function, and the for a rectangular array is
a bit annoying (i.e., allow non-rectangular and just report an
out-of-bounds error on attempts to explicitly access non-existent elements)
but that's easy enough to toss in with the other peculiarities in this
area.
SELECT unnest(array_agg)::text[]
FROM (
SELECT array_agg(a)
FROM ( VALUES (1, ARRAY[]::text[]::text), (1, ARRAY['1','2']::text[]::text)
) vals (v, a)
) txt_arrays;
David J.