BUG #15478: 配置文件 pg_hba.conf 异常

Started by PG Bug reporting formover 7 years ago3 messagesbugs
Jump to latest
#1PG Bug reporting form
noreply@postgresql.org

The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference: 15478
Logged by: newzero
Email address: dongjiu8816@hotmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 11.0
Operating system: windows 10
Description:

# IPv4 local connections:
host all all 127.0.0.1/32 md5
# IPv6 local connections:
host all all ::1/128 md5
如果需要本地免密码登录,只需要修改 ipv4 对应配置为 trust 即可,但实际中发现无效,只有修改 ipv4 对应配置为 trust
才可以,请核实。

#2Wèi Cōngruì
crvv.mail@gmail.com
In reply to: PG Bug reporting form (#1)
Re: BUG #15478: 配置文件 pg_hba.conf 异常

I am a native Chinese speaker, but I can't understand what you mean.
Obviously there are some errors in your words, please check.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 3:13 PM PG Bug reporting form
<noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:

Show quoted text

The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference: 15478
Logged by: newzero
Email address: dongjiu8816@hotmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 11.0
Operating system: windows 10
Description:

# IPv4 local connections:
host all all 127.0.0.1/32 md5
# IPv6 local connections:
host all all ::1/128 md5
如果需要本地免密码登录,只需要修改 ipv4 对应配置为 trust 即可,但实际中发现无效,只有修改 ipv4 对应配置为 trust
才可以,请核实。

#3Wèi Cōngruì
crvv.mail@gmail.com
In reply to: PG Bug reporting form (#1)
Re: BUG #15478: 配置文件 pg_hba.conf 异常

This is not a bug.

The default host of psql is localhost.
localhost can be resolved to ::1, which is an IPv6 address.

If you only update the IPv4 config, I guess you can use psql
-h127.0.0.1 to connect to the database.

Please don't send email to me and use "reply to all" in mailing lists.

Show quoted text

On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 9:08 AM 汪 枫 <dongjiu8816@hotmail.com> wrote:

I'sorry,i have errors in my words.I mean that,if we want to login the postgresql database without password,we should modify the ipv4 configuration of pg_hba.conf to trust,but in fact,i find that only modify the ipv6 configuration of pg_hba.conf to trust i can login without password.Obviously,it is unreasonable.