BUG #15999: jsonb_populate_record fails with array column
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 15999
Logged by: Richard
Email address: easteregg@verfriemelt.org
PostgreSQL version: 9.6.15
Operating system: Debian / Windows
Description:
given the following simplified table with one row inserted:
create table testa ( id serial, test text[] default
'{"test","test2"}'::text[] );
insert into testa values (default);
when we try to populate a record of testa type we run into trouble with
postgres in version 9.6.15
select jsonb_populate_record(null::testa , to_jsonb(testa)) FROM testa;
ERROR: 22P02: malformed array literal: "["test", "test2"]"
DETAIL: "[" must introduce explicitly-specified array dimensions.
LOCATION: array_in, arrayfuncs.c:269
with postgres 10 and higher we get the expected result:
select jsonb_populate_record(null::testa , to_jsonb(testa)) FROM testa;
jsonb_populate_record
═════════════════════
(1,"{test,test2}")
(1 row)
whe the array column is null, and therefor no contained array in the jsonb
representation, everything works fine under 9.6.15
update testa set test = null;
select jsonb_populate_record(null::testa , to_jsonb(testa)) FROM testa;
jsonb_populate_record
═════════════════════
(1,)
(1 row)
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
given the following simplified table with one row inserted:
create table testa ( id serial, test text[] default
'{"test","test2"}'::text[] );
insert into testa values (default);
when we try to populate a record of testa type we run into trouble with
postgres in version 9.6.15
select jsonb_populate_record(null::testa , to_jsonb(testa)) FROM testa;
ERROR: 22P02: malformed array literal: "["test", "test2"]"
DETAIL: "[" must introduce explicitly-specified array dimensions.
LOCATION: array_in, arrayfuncs.c:269
Yeah, this is something we aren't going to risk changing pre-v10.
cf35346e8 is what fixed it, but that was a pretty massive rewrite
with bugs of its own, and IIRC it changed some other behaviors
that were less obviously bugs than the case you're complaining of.
regards, tom lane