BUG #16946: It may be that the content of the document is missing

Started by PG Bug reporting formabout 5 years ago2 messagesbugs
Jump to latest
#1PG Bug reporting form
noreply@postgresql.org

The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference: 16946
Logged by: 强 魏
Email address: 1726002692@qq.com
PostgreSQL version: 13.2
Operating system: centos
Description:

No information about the function pg_get_function_arg_default was found in
the official manual.
user:postgres@db:postgres[[local]:5432]#select version();
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                                   version                                 
 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| PostgreSQL 13.2 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 7.3.0,
64-bit |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
(1 row)
Time: 0.664 ms
user:postgres@db:postgres[[local]:5432]#\df pg_get_function_arg_default
                                     List of functions
+------------+-----------------------------+------------------+---------------------+------+
|   Schema   |            Name             | Result data type | Argument
data types | Type |
+------------+-----------------------------+------------------+---------------------+------+
| pg_catalog | pg_get_function_arg_default | text             | oid, integer
       | func |
+------------+-----------------------------+------------------+---------------------+------+
(1 row)
#2Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: PG Bug reporting form (#1)
Re: BUG #16946: It may be that the content of the document is missing

PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:

No information about the function pg_get_function_arg_default was found in
the official manual.

It looks to me like that function is only meant as infrastructure
for an information_schema view, so leaving it out of the docs was
probably intentional. There's lots of undocumented internal
functions ...

regards, tom lane