BUG #16989: parameter track_commit_timestamp's category problem

Started by PG Bug reporting formabout 5 years ago2 messagesbugs
Jump to latest
#1PG Bug reporting form
noreply@postgresql.org

The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference: 16989
Logged by: yanliang lei
Email address: leiyanliang@highgo.com
PostgreSQL version: 13.1
Operating system: CentOS7.6
Description:

In the following sql statement, parameter track_commit_timestamp's category
is Replication,and this “Replication” is a first-level category,and this
“Replication”has four second-level categories。

postgres=# select category from pg_settings where
name='track_commit_timestamp';
-[ RECORD 1 ]---------
category | Replication

postgres=#

In the document( postgresql.org/docs/13/runtime-config-replication.html),
parameter track_commit_timestamp is in the “Sending Servers” category
,and,this “Sending Servers” is a second-level category。

so, what is the track_commit_timestamp’s category?

#2Bharath Rupireddy
bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com
In reply to: PG Bug reporting form (#1)
Re: BUG #16989: parameter track_commit_timestamp's category problem

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 2:38 PM PG Bug reporting form
<noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:

The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference: 16989
Logged by: yanliang lei
Email address: leiyanliang@highgo.com
PostgreSQL version: 13.1
Operating system: CentOS7.6
Description:

In the following sql statement, parameter track_commit_timestamp's category
is Replication,and this “Replication” is a first-level category,and this
“Replication”has four second-level categories。

postgres=# select category from pg_settings where
name='track_commit_timestamp';
-[ RECORD 1 ]---------
category | Replication

postgres=#

In the document( postgresql.org/docs/13/runtime-config-replication.html),
parameter track_commit_timestamp is in the “Sending Servers” category
,and,this “Sending Servers” is a second-level category。

so, what is the track_commit_timestamp’s category?

Thanks for reporting. It looks like it is correctly categorized in the
docs under "Replication / Sending Servers", whereas as in the code
guc.c, it is still put under "Replication". You may want to check the
thread at [1]/messages/by-id/20210413123139.GE6091@telsasoft.com where it's being actively discussed and Justin Pryzby
has a patch for fixing this.

[1]: /messages/by-id/20210413123139.GE6091@telsasoft.com

With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com