gcc 3.0.1
I have compiled PostgreSQL 7.1.2 with gcc 3.0.1, and have the following
problem: if I include first libpq++.h before iostream, id est:
#include <libpq++.h>
#include <iostream>
the compiler complains:
In file included from /usr/include/g++-v3/bits/locale_facets.tcc:38,
from /usr/include/g++-v3/bits/std_locale.h:41,
from /usr/include/g++-v3/bits/ostream.tcc:32,
from /usr/include/g++-v3/bits/std_ostream.h:278,
from /usr/include/g++-v3/bits/std_iostream.h:40,
from /usr/include/g++-v3/iostream:31,
from p.cc:3:
/usr/include/g++-v3/bits/std_limits.h:286:5: missing binary operator
/usr/include/g++-v3/bits/std_limits.h:483:5: missing binary operator
This is because somewhere in PostgreSQL you have the following code:
#ifndef true
#define true ((bool)1)
#endif
and it seems that in gcc 3.0.1, "true" is not defined, or that "true" is
a reserved word doesn't mean that is defined, or that the offending
lines below they don't exist in std_limit.h, I don't know as I no longer
have the old compiler. The workaround is to include first iostream, and
then libpq++. The offending lines in std_limits.h are the following:
#ifdef __CHAR_UNSIGNED__
#define __glibcpp_plain_char_is_signed false
#else
#define __glibcpp_plain_char_is_signed true
#endif
end somewhere below this one:
#if __glibcpp_plain_char_is_signed
#endif
which is preprocessed to:
#if true
#endif
when the #include<iostream> is before libpq++ and:
#if ((bool)1)
#endif
otherwise. This last statement is invalid for the compiler.
Leandro Fanzone
Leandro Fanzone <leandro@hasar.com> writes:
I have compiled PostgreSQL 7.1.2 with gcc 3.0.1, and have the following
problem: if I include first libpq++.h before iostream, id est:
#include <libpq++.h>
#include <iostream>
the compiler complains:
This is because somewhere in PostgreSQL you have the following code:
#ifndef true
#define true ((bool)1)
#endif
Yeah. c.h has
#ifndef __cplusplus
#ifndef bool
typedef char bool;
#endif /* ndef bool */
#endif /* not C++ */
#ifndef true
#define true ((bool) 1)
#endif
#ifndef false
#define false ((bool) 0)
#endif
It's been like that for quite some time, but it's always struck me as
bizarre: if we're willing to trust a C++ compiler to provide type
bool, why would we not trust it to provide the literals true and false
as well? ISTM the code should read
#ifndef __cplusplus
#ifndef bool
typedef char bool;
#endif
#ifndef true
#define true ((bool) 1)
#endif
#ifndef false
#define false ((bool) 0)
#endif
#endif /* not C++ */
Does anyone have an objection to this?
regards, tom lane
I like the change.
Leandro Fanzone <leandro@hasar.com> writes:
I have compiled PostgreSQL 7.1.2 with gcc 3.0.1, and have the following
problem: if I include first libpq++.h before iostream, id est:
#include <libpq++.h>
#include <iostream>
the compiler complains:This is because somewhere in PostgreSQL you have the following code:
#ifndef true
#define true ((bool)1)
#endifYeah. c.h has
#ifndef __cplusplus
#ifndef bool
typedef char bool;
#endif /* ndef bool */
#endif /* not C++ */#ifndef true
#define true ((bool) 1)
#endif#ifndef false
#define false ((bool) 0)
#endifIt's been like that for quite some time, but it's always struck me as
bizarre: if we're willing to trust a C++ compiler to provide type
bool, why would we not trust it to provide the literals true and false
as well? ISTM the code should read#ifndef __cplusplus
#ifndef bool
typedef char bool;
#endif#ifndef true
#define true ((bool) 1)
#endif#ifndef false
#define false ((bool) 0)
#endif#endif /* not C++ */
Does anyone have an objection to this?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
Fine for me also.
Leandro.
Tom Lane wrote:
Show quoted text
Leandro Fanzone <leandro@hasar.com> writes:
I have compiled PostgreSQL 7.1.2 with gcc 3.0.1, and have the following
problem: if I include first libpq++.h before iostream, id est:
#include <libpq++.h>
#include <iostream>
the compiler complains:This is because somewhere in PostgreSQL you have the following code:
#ifndef true
#define true ((bool)1)
#endifYeah. c.h has
#ifndef __cplusplus
#ifndef bool
typedef char bool;
#endif /* ndef bool */
#endif /* not C++ */#ifndef true
#define true ((bool) 1)
#endif#ifndef false
#define false ((bool) 0)
#endifIt's been like that for quite some time, but it's always struck me as
bizarre: if we're willing to trust a C++ compiler to provide type
bool, why would we not trust it to provide the literals true and false
as well? ISTM the code should read#ifndef __cplusplus
#ifndef bool
typedef char bool;
#endif#ifndef true
#define true ((bool) 1)
#endif#ifndef false
#define false ((bool) 0)
#endif#endif /* not C++ */
Does anyone have an objection to this?
regards, tom lane