BUG #17702: An assert failed in parse_utilcmd.c
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 17702
Logged by: xin wen
Email address: xinwen@stu.scu.edu.cn
PostgreSQL version: 15.1
Operating system: Ubuntu 20.04
Description:
When executing the following query:
CREATE FUNCTION function0 () RETURNS INT LANGUAGE SQL AS $$ CREATE TABLE
table1 ( column0 INT CHECK ( 'x' = 'x' )) ; SELECT 1 ; $$ ;
SELECT function0 () FROM ( VALUES ( 1 ) , ( 1 ) ) AS alias0;
I get a failed assertion with the following stacktrace:
Core was generated by `postgres: postgres test [local] SELECT
'.
Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
#0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50
#1 0x00007faf78ccc859 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
#2 0x000055af27392a88 in ExceptionalCondition
(conditionName=conditionName@entry=0x55af274b0131 "stmt->constraints ==
NIL", errorType=errorType@entry=0x55af273f0498 "FailedAssertion",
fileName=fileName@entry=0x55af274ae8f8
"/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/backend/parser/parse_utilcmd.c",
lineNumber=lineNumber@entry=307) at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/backend/utils/error/assert.c:69
#3 0x000055af27049dbd in transformCreateStmt
(stmt=stmt@entry=0x55af287f9608,
queryString=queryString@entry=0x55af287f89b0 " CREATE TABLE table1 ( column0
INT CHECK ( 'x' = 'x' )) ; SELECT 1 ; ") at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/backend/parser/parse_utilcmd.c:307
#4 0x000055af2726cff7 in ProcessUtilitySlow (pstate=0x55af287aa490,
pstmt=0x55af287fa1d0, queryString=0x55af287f89b0 " CREATE TABLE table1 (
column0 INT CHECK ( 'x' = 'x' )) ; SELECT 1 ; ",
context=PROCESS_UTILITY_QUERY, params=0x0, queryEnv=0x0, qc=0x0,
dest=<optimized out>) at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/backend/tcop/utility.c:1147
#5 0x000055af2726c541 in standard_ProcessUtility (pstmt=0x55af287fa1d0,
queryString=0x55af287f89b0 " CREATE TABLE table1 ( column0 INT CHECK ( 'x' =
'x' )) ; SELECT 1 ; ", readOnlyTree=<optimized out>,
context=PROCESS_UTILITY_QUERY, params=0x0, queryEnv=0x0, dest=0x55af276a45a0
<donothingDR>, qc=0x0) at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/backend/tcop/utility.c:1074
#6 0x000055af270e7cac in postquel_getnext (es=0x55af287fa268,
es=0x55af287fa268, fcache=0x55af287f8870, fcache=0x55af287f8870) at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/backend/executor/functions.c:887
#7 fmgr_sql (fcinfo=0x55af287cc618) at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/backend/executor/functions.c:1203
#8 0x000055af270d2683 in ExecInterpExpr (state=0x55af287cc530,
econtext=0x55af287cc0d8, isnull=<optimized out>) at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/backend/executor/execExprInterp.c:1262
#9 0x000055af270e0c35 in ExecEvalExprSwitchContext (isNull=0x7ffce366c3f7,
econtext=0x55af287cc0d8, state=0x55af287cc530) at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/include/executor/executor.h:341
#10 ExecProject (projInfo=0x55af287cc528) at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/include/executor/executor.h:375
#11 ExecScan (node=<optimized out>, accessMtd=0x55af271125b0 <ValuesNext>,
recheckMtd=0x55af271125a0 <ValuesRecheck>) at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/backend/executor/execScan.c:238
#12 0x000055af270d6c93 in ExecProcNode (node=0x55af287cbed0) at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/include/executor/executor.h:259
#13 ExecutePlan (execute_once=<optimized out>, dest=0x55af287a5c50,
direction=<optimized out>, numberTuples=0, sendTuples=<optimized out>,
operation=CMD_SELECT, use_parallel_mode=<optimized out>,
planstate=0x55af287cbed0, estate=0x55af287cbc90) at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/backend/executor/execMain.c:1636
#14 standard_ExecutorRun (queryDesc=0x55af287c57c0, direction=<optimized
out>, count=0, execute_once=<optimized out>) at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/backend/executor/execMain.c:363
#15 0x000055af27269e5f in PortalRunSelect (portal=0x55af2874b560,
forward=<optimized out>, count=0, dest=<optimized out>) at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/backend/tcop/pquery.c:924
#16 0x000055af2726b431 in PortalRun (portal=portal@entry=0x55af2874b560,
count=count@entry=9223372036854775807, isTopLevel=isTopLevel@entry=true,
run_once=run_once@entry=true, dest=dest@entry=0x55af287a5c50,
altdest=altdest@entry=0x55af287a5c50, qc=0x7ffce366c6a0) at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/backend/tcop/pquery.c:768
#17 0x000055af27267202 in exec_simple_query (query_string=0x55af286de010
"SELECT function0 () FROM ( VALUES ( 1 ) , ( 1 ) ) AS alias0;") at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/backend/tcop/postgres.c:1250
#18 0x000055af27268f8c in PostgresMain (dbname=<optimized out>,
username=<optimized out>) at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/backend/tcop/postgres.c:4581
#19 0x000055af271d5e8a in BackendRun (port=<optimized out>, port=<optimized
out>) at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c:4504
#20 BackendStartup (port=<optimized out>) at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c:4232
#21 ServerLoop () at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c:1806
#22 0x000055af271d6ffb in PostmasterMain (argc=<optimized out>,
argv=0x55af286d8310) at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c:1478
#23 0x000055af26f01630 in main (argc=3, argv=0x55af286d8310) at
/home/postgres/postgresql-15.1/bld_debugging/../src/backend/main/main.c:202
I also find this assert failed in 14.6 using the same statement.
On 29 Nov 2022, at 03:45, PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:
When executing the following query:
CREATE FUNCTION function0 () RETURNS INT LANGUAGE SQL AS $$ CREATE TABLE
table1 ( column0 INT CHECK ( 'x' = 'x' )) ; SELECT 1 ; $$ ;
SELECT function0 () FROM ( VALUES ( 1 ) , ( 1 ) ) AS alias0;I get a failed assertion with the following stacktrace:
Core was generated by `postgres: postgres test [local] SELECT
'.
Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
#0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50
#1 0x00007faf78ccc859 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
#2 0x000055af27392a88 in ExceptionalCondition
(conditionName=conditionName@entry=0x55af274b0131 "stmt->constraints ==
NIL", errorType=errorType@entry=0x55af273f0498 "FailedAssertion",
fileName=fileName@entry=0x55af274ae8f8
This is AFAICT due to the utility statement already having gone through parse
analysis and thus have the constraints list already set here. Forcing a read-
only protection via the functionality from 7c337b6b5 the assertion is avoided
and the function executes as expected:
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/functions.c b/src/backend/executor/functions.c
index e134a82ff7..b0941151b2 100644
--- a/src/backend/executor/functions.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/functions.c
@@ -884,7 +884,7 @@ postquel_getnext(execution_state *es, SQLFunctionCachePtr fcache)
{
ProcessUtility(es->qd->plannedstmt,
fcache->src,
- false,
+ (nodeTag(es->qd->plannedstmt->utilityStmt) == T_CreateStmt ? true : false),
PROCESS_UTILITY_QUERY,
es->qd->params,
es->qd->queryEnv,Maintaining a list of statements that scribble and force those to readonly
could be a way forward? Forcing processing of all utility statements to be
readonly seems like a blunt instrument here, not sure what the best course of
action would be.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
On 29 Nov 2022, at 03:45, PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:
When executing the following query:CREATE FUNCTION function0 () RETURNS INT LANGUAGE SQL AS $$ CREATE TABLE
table1 ( column0 INT CHECK ( 'x' = 'x' )) ; SELECT 1 ; $$ ;
SELECT function0 () FROM ( VALUES ( 1 ) , ( 1 ) ) AS alias0;I get a failed assertion with the following stacktrace:
This is AFAICT due to the utility statement already having gone through parse
analysis and thus have the constraints list already set here. Forcing a read-
only protection via the functionality from 7c337b6b5 the assertion is avoided
and the function executes as expected:
Right.
Maintaining a list of statements that scribble and force those to readonly
could be a way forward? Forcing processing of all utility statements to be
readonly seems like a blunt instrument here, not sure what the best course of
action would be.
No, I think that's exactly what we should do. This is just a silly
oversight in 7c337b6b5 --- I should have thought about SQL functions
executing more than once in a query.
(Eventually we ought to nuke functions.c's private version of a plan
cache in favor of using plancache.c, but nobody's got to that yet.
It'd be more obvious then that we have to protect the cached copy.)
regards, tom lane
On 29 Nov 2022, at 17:22, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
On 29 Nov 2022, at 03:45, PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:
When executing the following query:CREATE FUNCTION function0 () RETURNS INT LANGUAGE SQL AS $$ CREATE TABLE
table1 ( column0 INT CHECK ( 'x' = 'x' )) ; SELECT 1 ; $$ ;
SELECT function0 () FROM ( VALUES ( 1 ) , ( 1 ) ) AS alias0;I get a failed assertion with the following stacktrace:
This is AFAICT due to the utility statement already having gone through parse
analysis and thus have the constraints list already set here. Forcing a read-
only protection via the functionality from 7c337b6b5 the assertion is avoided
and the function executes as expected:Right.
Thanks for confirming.
Maintaining a list of statements that scribble and force those to readonly
could be a way forward? Forcing processing of all utility statements to be
readonly seems like a blunt instrument here, not sure what the best course of
action would be.No, I think that's exactly what we should do. This is just a silly
oversight in 7c337b6b5 --- I should have thought about SQL functions
executing more than once in a query.
Oh, ok. I'll go enforce readonly on all utility statements in HEAD and the
applicable backbranches tonight then.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
On 29 Nov 2022, at 17:47, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
I'll go enforce readonly on all utility statements in HEAD and the
applicable backbranches tonight then.
.. and just as I hit send I noticed that you had fixed it already =) Sorry for the noise.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/