BUG #18563: Where is tha "FIRST" aggregate function??

Started by PG Bug reporting formover 1 year ago3 messagesbugs
Jump to latest
#1PG Bug reporting form
noreply@postgresql.org

The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference: 18563
Logged by: Iuri Tomazini
Email address: iuritomazini.dev@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 16.0
Operating system: pgAdmin 4
Description:

PostagrSQL do not have a "FIRST" aggraregate function and it is a huge
mistake. All other good database has this and some of them are automatic,
such as MySQL. Take a fast search and discover that this kind of topic is
commonly find in internet (example: stackoverflow site). I am migrating for
other database, bacause of the dificulty to get a similar resource to
substitute the "FIRST" in PostgreSQL and I hope you can recognize this bad
error and implement something to suppply this lack. Good bye!

#2Christophe Pettus
xof@thebuild.com
In reply to: PG Bug reporting form (#1)
Re: BUG #18563: Where is tha "FIRST" aggregate function??

On Aug 1, 2024, at 09:25, PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:
I am migrating for
other database, bacause of the dificulty to get a similar resource to
substitute the "FIRST" in PostgreSQL and I hope you can recognize this bad
error and implement something to suppply this lack. Good bye!

It's trivial to implement in PostgreSQL:

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/First/last_(aggregate)

#3Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Christophe Pettus (#2)
Re: BUG #18563: Where is tha "FIRST" aggregate function??

Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com> writes:

On Aug 1, 2024, at 09:25, PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:
I am migrating for
other database, bacause of the dificulty to get a similar resource to
substitute the "FIRST" in PostgreSQL and I hope you can recognize this bad
error and implement something to suppply this lack. Good bye!

It's trivial to implement in PostgreSQL:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/First/last_(aggregate)

The built-in (since v16) "any_value()" aggregate is actually just like
what that page shows for "first()". The name is chosen to reflect the
fact that the aggregate itself isn't promising anything: you have to
use it in the correct way to get useful behavior.

regards, tom lane