\ref in docs

Started by Bruce Momjianalmost 27 years ago3 messagesdocs
Jump to latest
#1Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us

In the developers documentation, I am seeing \ref like:

Figure \ref{parsetree} shows the parse tree built by the grammar rules

Note that every Sort and SeqScan node appearing in figure \ref{plan} has

I can't figure out what they should be. The developers manual from
Stephan's stuff is really good.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
#2Thomas Lockhart
lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#1)
Re: \ref in docs

In the developers documentation, I am seeing \ref like:
Figure \ref{parsetree} shows the parse tree built by the grammar rules
Note that every Sort and SeqScan node appearing in figure \ref{plan} has
I can't figure out what they should be. The developers manual from
Stephan's stuff is really good.

Yes it is. I apparently forgot to resolve the rest of these latex-isms
into docbook-isms for referring to tables or graphics. In most cases
they were referring to internal tabular or listing info, so are
trivial to resolve; I had originally thought that they were referring
to graphics which I wasn't finding elsewhere.

There are probably a few other problems lurking in there; the markup
transformation was a pretty big job...

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California

#3Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Thomas Lockhart (#2)
Re: [DOCS] Re: \ref in docs

In the developers documentation, I am seeing \ref like:
Figure \ref{parsetree} shows the parse tree built by the grammar rules
Note that every Sort and SeqScan node appearing in figure \ref{plan} has
I can't figure out what they should be. The developers manual from
Stephan's stuff is really good.

Yes it is. I apparently forgot to resolve the rest of these latex-isms
into docbook-isms for referring to tables or graphics. In most cases
they were referring to internal tabular or listing info, so are
trivial to resolve; I had originally thought that they were referring
to graphics which I wasn't finding elsewhere.

There are probably a few other problems lurking in there; the markup
transformation was a pretty big job...

Yes, I can imagine. It looks pretty good.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026