jade X openjade

Halley Pacheco de Oliveira wrote:

In my Athon 1.7 512 MB RAM computer with Debian it
takes 2m6s to generate de PostgreSQL 7.4.1 HTML
documentation using JADE and 4m7s using OPENJADE
(almost 2X). So why use OPENJADE ?

I would have to double check, but I think OPENJADE offers better backend
support.

Personally I think the real question should be, Why *JADE*? We should be
doing whatever it takes to move to XML/XSLT.

Using Apache xerces I can transform a 1000 page document in less than a
minute.

J

Halley

______________________________________________________________________

Yahoo! Mail - O melhor e-mail do Brasil! Abra sua conta agora:
http://br.yahoo.com/info/mail.html

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

-- 
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL

Joshua D. Drake wrote:

Halley Pacheco de Oliveira wrote:

In my Athon 1.7 512 MB RAM computer with Debian it
takes 2m6s to generate de PostgreSQL 7.4.1 HTML
documentation using JADE and 4m7s using OPENJADE
(almost 2X). So why use OPENJADE ?

I would have to double check, but I think OPENJADE offers better backend
support.

Personally I think the real question should be, Why *JADE*? We should be
doing whatever it takes to move to XML/XSLT.

Using Apache xerces I can transform a 1000 page document in less than a
minute.

I have used xercess-C++ in my current project and I can tell you one thing. It's
object model is broken.

It is a fine API in general but the way it's object model is broken, makes me
hate it.. really..

Given a better choice I wouldn't use it. But I haven't used any other XML
toolkits either. My XML experience is pretty limited..

Shridhar

I have used xercess-C++ in my current project and I can tell you one thing. It's
object model is broken.

Well what I believe we are really after is Xalan which Xerces is required
to run. I believe it is Xalan that actually does the XSLT transformations.

It is a fine API in general but the way it's object model is broken, makes me
hate it.. really..

Given a better choice I wouldn't use it. But I haven't used any other XML
toolkits either. My XML experience is pretty limited..

Shridhar

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

--
Co-Founder
Command Prompt, Inc.
The wheel's spinning but the hamster's dead

-On [20040221 21:52], Joshua D. Drake (jd@commandprompt.com) wrote:

Well what I believe we are really after is Xalan which Xerces is required
to run. I believe it is Xalan that actually does the XSLT transformations.

Correct.

Xerces is the parser (both DOM and SAX).

I have found Xerces+Xalan to find issues in my XML/XSLT 'code' which
xsltproc didn't clearly label as wrong, whereas xsltproc understands
EXSLT natively.

--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(at)wxs.nl> / asmodai / kita no mono
PGP fingerprint: 2D92 980E 45FE 2C28 9DB7 9D88 97E6 839B 2EAC 625B
http://www.tendra.org/ | http://diary.in-nomine.org/
My name is Legion: for we are many...