Docs build failure on plpgsql.sgml
I am seeing a docs build failure :
openjade:plpgsql.sgml:1646:10:E: end tag for "SECT3" omitted, but
OMITTAG NO was specified
openjade:plpgsql.sgml:1640:5: start tag was here
make: *** [html] Error 1
Adding an extra </sect3> tag after line 1645 will make it build ok on my
system (not sure if that was the intent of the previous change tho)
regards
Mark
Mark Kirkwood <markir@coretech.co.nz> writes:
I am seeing a docs build failure :
Fixed, thanks. (You must be running a pickier version of docbook
than is installed at postgresql.org ...)
regards, tom lane
Hmmm ... good point - configure thinks I am running 4.2, but the
stylesheets etc might be more recent than postgresql.org's:
$ rpm -qa|grep docbook
docbook-dtds-1.0-25
docbook-style-dsssl-1.78-4
Tom Lane wrote:
Show quoted text
Mark Kirkwood <markir@coretech.co.nz> writes:
I am seeing a docs build failure :
Fixed, thanks. (You must be running a pickier version of docbook
than is installed at postgresql.org ...)regards, tom lane
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 12:36:55PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Hmmm ... good point - configure thinks I am running 4.2, but the
stylesheets etc might be more recent than postgresql.org's:$ rpm -qa|grep docbook
docbook-dtds-1.0-25
docbook-style-dsssl-1.78-4
Peter announced just the other day he wants the docs to be built with
stylesheets 1.79 ...
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[@]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Ciencias pol�ticas es la ciencia de entender por qu�
los pol�ticos act�an como lo hacen" (netfunny.com)
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl> writes:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 12:36:55PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Hmmm ... good point - configure thinks I am running 4.2, but the
stylesheets etc might be more recent than postgresql.org's:$ rpm -qa|grep docbook
docbook-dtds-1.0-25
docbook-style-dsssl-1.78-4
Peter announced just the other day he wants the docs to be built with
stylesheets 1.79 ...
Mark's versions are the same as what I have on an up-to-date Fedora Core
3 box. (And I did duplicate his failure upon trying ... I'd not tried
to build the docs on that box lately.)
If 1.78 is pickier than 1.79, I think it's good to keep ourselves honest
by making sure that the docs build against 1.78. We can say that 1.79
wins if differences of visual presentation come up, but as far as the
markup correctness is concerned, better tighter than looser.
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote:
Fixed, thanks. (You must be running a pickier version of docbook
than is installed at postgresql.org ...)
I think the only thing that could affect this is the version of
jade/openjade. Certainly not the stylesheet version.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/