ROW SHARE/SELECT ... FOR UPDATE + foreign keys
What would people think of adding a note to the ROW SHARE section of
Table-Level Locks remarking on the fact that referential integrity
checks expressed through foreign keys do SELECT ... FOR UPDATES.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/explicit-
locking.html#LOCKING-TABLES
It was somewhat challenging today to try to track down a pervasive
locking issue related to a table not directly referenced in a stored
procedure but that was referenced by a key in a table that was being
updated.
I'm not sure how this changes with the new shared row locking
implementation in 8.1...
--
Thomas F. O'Connell
Co-Founder, Information Architect
Sitening, LLC
Strategic Open Source: Open Your i™
http://www.sitening.com/
110 30th Avenue North, Suite 6
Nashville, TN 37203-6320
615-260-0005
Thomas F. O'Connell wrote:
What would people think of adding a note to the ROW SHARE section of
Table-Level Locks remarking on the fact that referential integrity
checks expressed through foreign keys do SELECT ... FOR UPDATES.http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/explicit-
locking.html#LOCKING-TABLESIt was somewhat challenging today to try to track down a pervasive
locking issue related to a table not directly referenced in a stored
procedure but that was referenced by a key in a table that was being
updated.I'm not sure how this changes with the new shared row locking
implementation in 8.1...
8.1 will use _shared_ row locks for such cases.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073