Array functions not mentioned in Index

Started by Mario Splivaloabout 17 years ago8 messagesdocs
Jump to latest
#1Mario Splivalo
mario.splivalo@megafon.hr

None of the array functions
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html)
are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional?
I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index.

Mike

#2Alvaro Herrera
alvherre@2ndquadrant.com
In reply to: Mario Splivalo (#1)
Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index

Mario Splivalo wrote:

None of the array functions
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html)
are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional?
I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index.

Agreed -- please submit a patch.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

#3Mario Splivalo
mario.splivalo@megafon.hr
In reply to: Alvaro Herrera (#2)
Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

Mario Splivalo wrote:

None of the array functions
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html)
are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional?
I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index.

Agreed -- please submit a patch.

Sure thing. It will take some time to get along with Docbook, indexing
and everything.

Mike

#4Mario Splivalo
mario.splivalo@megafon.hr
In reply to: Alvaro Herrera (#2)
Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

Mario Splivalo wrote:

None of the array functions
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html)
are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional?
I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index.

Agreed -- please submit a patch.

Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation?

Mario

Attachments:

func.sgml.patchtext/x-diff; name=func.sgml.patchDownload+37-0
#5Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Mario Splivalo (#4)
Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index

Mario Splivalo <mario.splivalo@megafon.hr> writes:

Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation?

I think you just did. Applied, thanks.

regards, tom lane

PS: why'd you omit unnest()?

#6Mario Splivalo
mario.splivalo@megafon.hr
In reply to: Tom Lane (#5)
Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index

Tom Lane wrote:

Mario Splivalo <mario.splivalo@megafon.hr> writes:

Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation?

I think you just did. Applied, thanks.

I pulled the source from CVS HEAD branch, I see that is 8.4
documentation (for instance, 'cardinality' function is nonexistant for 8.3).

PS: why'd you omit unnest()?

I overlooked it, I guess. Sorry.

Mike

#7Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Mario Splivalo (#6)
Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index

Mario Splivalo wrote:

Tom Lane wrote:

Mario Splivalo <mario.splivalo@megafon.hr> writes:

Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation?

I think you just did. Applied, thanks.

I pulled the source from CVS HEAD branch, I see that is 8.4
documentation (for instance, 'cardinality' function is nonexistant for 8.3).

PS: why'd you omit unnest()?

I overlooked it, I guess. Sorry.

Did unnest() get added properly too?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

#8Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#7)
Re: Array functions not mentioned in Index

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:

Did unnest() get added properly too?

Yes, I included it in the patch.

regards, tom lane