timetz regression test is showing several DST-related failures
I am seeing the attached regression diffs on timetz, which passed
last week. It looks like all of these are related to the fact that
unmarked timetz values are now presumed to be PST (-8) not PST (-7).
regards, tom lane
*** ./expected/timetz.out Wed Oct 3 01:29:26 2001
--- ./results/timetz.out Tue Oct 30 12:51:38 2001
***************
*** 33,62 ****
00:01:00-07
01:00:00-07
02:03:00-07
! (3 rows)
SELECT f1 AS "Seven" FROM TIMETZ_TBL WHERE f1 > '05:06:07';
Seven
----------------
07:07:00-08
- 08:08:00-04
11:59:00-07
12:00:00-07
12:01:00-07
23:59:00-07
23:59:59.99-07
! (7 rows)
SELECT f1 AS "None" FROM TIMETZ_TBL WHERE f1 < '00:00';
None
! ------
! (0 rows)
SELECT f1 AS "Ten" FROM TIMETZ_TBL WHERE f1 >= '00:00';
Ten
----------------
- 00:01:00-07
- 01:00:00-07
02:03:00-07
07:07:00-08
08:08:00-04
--- 33,62 ----
00:01:00-07
01:00:00-07
02:03:00-07
! 08:08:00-04
! (4 rows)
SELECT f1 AS "Seven" FROM TIMETZ_TBL WHERE f1 > '05:06:07';
Seven
----------------
07:07:00-08
11:59:00-07
12:00:00-07
12:01:00-07
23:59:00-07
23:59:59.99-07
! (6 rows)
SELECT f1 AS "None" FROM TIMETZ_TBL WHERE f1 < '00:00';
None
! -------------
! 00:01:00-07
! 01:00:00-07
! (2 rows)
SELECT f1 AS "Ten" FROM TIMETZ_TBL WHERE f1 >= '00:00';
Ten
----------------
02:03:00-07
07:07:00-08
08:08:00-04
***************
*** 65,71 ****
12:01:00-07
23:59:00-07
23:59:59.99-07
! (10 rows)
--
-- TIME simple math
--- 65,71 ----
12:01:00-07
23:59:00-07
23:59:59.99-07
! (8 rows)
--
-- TIME simple math
======================================================================
I said:
I am seeing the attached regression diffs on timetz, which passed
last week. It looks like all of these are related to the fact that
unmarked timetz values are now presumed to be PST (-8) not PST (-7).
Sigh, make that "PST (-8) not PDT (-7)"
regards, tom lane
I am seeing the attached regression diffs on timetz, which passed
last week. It looks like all of these are related to the fact that
unmarked timetz values are now presumed to be PST (-8) not PST (-7).Sigh, make that "PST (-8) not PDT (-7)"
Whatever. I'll look at them to see if I can formulate a test which fills
in the blanks correctly.
Nothing like a useless data type which is *also* a pita :/
- Thomas
I am seeing the attached regression diffs on timetz, which passed
last week. It looks like all of these are related to the fact that
unmarked timetz values are now presumed to be PST (-8) not PST (-7).
OK, I've updated the regression test by including an explicit time zone
in the query constants. All tests pass on my Linux box.
- Thomas