Using '>' in docs

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:

I see 34 instance of "=>" in our docs. Shouldn't the '>' be escaped,
e.g. =&gt;?

In principle, yes, though you can often get away with this as long as
there's not a '<' nearby ...

regards, tom lane

--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:51:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:

I see 34 instance of "=>" in our docs. Shouldn't the '>' be escaped,
e.g. =&gt;?

In principle, yes, though you can often get away with this as long as
there's not a '<' nearby ...

Yeah, that's what I thought --- it seems sloppy. What I am not clear
about is how to find other cases.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:53:51PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:51:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:

I see 34 instance of "=>" in our docs. Shouldn't the '>' be escaped,
e.g. =&gt;?

In principle, yes, though you can often get away with this as long as
there's not a '<' nearby ...

Yeah, that's what I thought --- it seems sloppy. What I am not clear
about is how to find other cases.

Done.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs