pg_rewind confusion

Started by Bruce Momjianover 9 years ago5 messagesdocs
Jump to latest
#1Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us

I was confused by pg_rewind's ability to use a remote source server, and
another core team member was confused as well, so I figured I should
update the pg_rewind docs to be clearer.

Attached is a patch to do that.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+                     Ancient Roman grave inscription +

Attachments:

pg_rewind.difftext/x-diff; charset=us-asciiDownload+89-89
#2Michael Paquier
michael@paquier.xyz
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#1)
Re: pg_rewind confusion

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:

I was confused by pg_rewind's ability to use a remote source server, and
another core team member was confused as well, so I figured I should
update the pg_rewind docs to be clearer.

Attached is a patch to do that.

This is a clean set of improvements.

-   <xref linkend="guc-full-page-writes"> must also be enabled.  That is the
-   default.
+   <xref linkend="guc-full-page-writes"> must also be on, but it is
+   enabled by default.
Perhaps you should add a <literal> markup around "on"? And say "must
be also set to on"
-        with superuser access. This option requires the server to be running
-        and not in recovery mode.
+        with superuser access. This option requires the local or remote
+        server to be running and not in recovery mode.
I don't think that "local or remote" is an improvement here. You could
just say "source".
+      Copy all other files such as <filename>clog</filename> and
clog is not a term used a lot in the docs. It may be better to refer
to pg_clog, or transaction status data.
-- 
Michael

--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs

#3Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Michael Paquier (#2)
Re: pg_rewind confusion

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:11:00PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:

I was confused by pg_rewind's ability to use a remote source server, and
another core team member was confused as well, so I figured I should
update the pg_rewind docs to be clearer.

Attached is a patch to do that.

This is a clean set of improvements.

-   <xref linkend="guc-full-page-writes"> must also be enabled.  That is the
-   default.
+   <xref linkend="guc-full-page-writes"> must also be on, but it is
+   enabled by default.
Perhaps you should add a <literal> markup around "on"? And say "must
be also set to on"

Well, "must also be on" isn't using "on" as a literal, but "must be also
set to on" does use it as a literal, and I changed the text to that.

-        with superuser access. This option requires the server to be running
-        and not in recovery mode.
+        with superuser access. This option requires the local or remote
+        server to be running and not in recovery mode.
I don't think that "local or remote" is an improvement here. You could
just say "source".

I was trying to highlight that the source can be remote with
--source-server. I have change it to what you suggested. Is it stil
clear?

+ Copy all other files such as <filename>clog</filename> and
clog is not a term used a lot in the docs. It may be better to refer
to pg_clog, or transaction status data.

Agreed, changed to "pg_clog".

Updated patch attached.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+                     Ancient Roman grave inscription +

Attachments:

pg_rewind.difftext/x-diff; charset=us-asciiDownload+94-94
#4Michael Paquier
michael@paquier.xyz
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#3)
Re: pg_rewind confusion

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:11:00PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:

+ Copy all other files such as <filename>clog</filename> and
clog is not a term used a lot in the docs. It may be better to refer
to pg_clog, or transaction status data.

Agreed, changed to "pg_clog".

Updated patch attached.

Thanks. That looks fine to me. This documentation becomes really clearer.
--
Michael

--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs

#5Bruce Momjian
bruce@momjian.us
In reply to: Michael Paquier (#4)
Re: pg_rewind confusion

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 08:35:32AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:11:00PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:

+ Copy all other files such as <filename>clog</filename> and
clog is not a term used a lot in the docs. It may be better to refer
to pg_clog, or transaction status data.

Agreed, changed to "pg_clog".

Updated patch attached.

Thanks. That looks fine to me. This documentation becomes really clearer.

Patch applied to head only as this did not fix any documentation bugs.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+                     Ancient Roman grave inscription +

--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs