Consistent capitalization of procedural languages
In a not-so-rare case of OCD I realized we have a few different ways to
capitalize the names of procedural languages in the documentation (and code
comments). There is one way used almost exclusively, and then a few less
common variants:
PL/pgSQL: 867
PL/pgsql: 22
PL/PgSQL: 15
pl/pgsql: 8
PL/pgSqL: 1
Pl/pgSQL: 1
PL/Perl: 618
PL/perl: 10
pl/perl: 6
PL/Python: 781
PL/python: 15
pl/python: 6
PL/Tcl: 289
PL/TCL: 2
pl/tcl: 1
The attached patch moves to consistently using PL/pgSQL, PL/Perl, PL/Python and
PL/Tcl. Language files are left as-is, but if this is applied I’m happy to fix
those up as well and submit to -translators.
cheers ./daniel
Attachments:
consistent_pl_spelling.patchapplication/octet-stream; name=consistent_pl_spelling.patchDownload+41-40
On 3/24/17 05:44, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
The attached patch moves to consistently using PL/pgSQL, PL/Perl, PL/Python and
PL/Tcl.
committed
Language files are left as-is, but if this is applied I’m happy to fix
those up as well and submit to -translators.
This will probably not be necessary. It's only a handful of places.
Translators can fix that up themselves.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs