SCRAM RFC

Started by Peter Eisentrautalmost 9 years ago3 messagesdocs
Jump to latest
#1Peter Eisentraut
peter_e@gmx.net

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/sasl-authentication.html
contains that SCRAM is described in RFC 7677 and RFC 5741, but the
latter appears to be a mistake. Perhaps RFC 5802 was meant?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs

#2Michael Paquier
michael@paquier.xyz
In reply to: Peter Eisentraut (#1)
Re: SCRAM RFC

On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/sasl-authentication.html
contains that SCRAM is described in RFC 7677 and RFC 5741, but the
latter appears to be a mistake. Perhaps RFC 5802 was meant?

Indeed, it should be s/5741/5802/.
--
Michael

--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs

#3Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com
In reply to: Michael Paquier (#2)
Re: SCRAM RFC

On 05/28/2017 06:13 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:

On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/sasl-authentication.html
contains that SCRAM is described in RFC 7677 and RFC 5741, but the
latter appears to be a mistake. Perhaps RFC 5802 was meant?

Indeed, it should be s/5741/5802/.

Fixed, thanks!

- Heikki

--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs