Correction in SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE lock description
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/explicit-locking.html
Description:
The documentation says :
"This lock mode is not automatically acquired by any PostgreSQL command."
I am wrong if I say that a "ADD CONSTRAINT toto FOREIGN KEY" command will
take a SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE lock on both tables concerned by the foreign key
?
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
2017-10-09 6:07 GMT-03:00 <diemersebastien@yahoo.fr>:
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/explicit-locking.html
Description:The documentation says :
"This lock mode is not automatically acquired by any PostgreSQL command."
You are reading 9.4 documentation but...
I am wrong if I say that a "ADD CONSTRAINT toto FOREIGN KEY" command will
take a SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE lock on both tables concerned by the foreign key
?
... you are testing with >= 9.5. Indeed, SREL replaced AEL in this
ALTER TABLE case [1]https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/explicit-locking.html.
[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/explicit-locking.html
--
Euler Taveira Timbira -
http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs