No reference to postgres_fdw in FTS docs
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/textsearch-indexes.html
Description:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/textsearch-indexes.html
The last paragraph mentions the dblink module, but surely postgres_fdw
deserves a mention here too - especially with its increasing ability to push
more of the query onto the foreign servers.
Also, I think it would be worth mentioning elsewhere in the documentation
(e.g. https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/indexes-types.html) the
impact that maintenance_work_mem has on the creation time for different
index types - currently I can't find this anywhere else except on this FTS
page.
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:50:39AM +0000, steven.winfield@cantabcapital.com wrote:
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/textsearch-indexes.html
Description:https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/textsearch-indexes.html
The last paragraph mentions the dblink module, but surely postgres_fdw
deserves a mention here too - especially with its increasing ability to push
more of the query onto the foreign servers.Also, I think it would be worth mentioning elsewhere in the documentation
(e.g. https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/indexes-types.html) the
impact that maintenance_work_mem has on the creation time for different
index types - currently I can't find this anywhere else except on this FTS
page.
I have applied the attached doc patch which will appear in PG 11.
Thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +