Where might I propose a 'feature'?
I find the pg_hba.conf file to be frustrating in its configuration. I dont
see anywhere in the document itself that I would be able to use a netmask,
say:
192.168/16
which I would find to be far easier than the current setup. It doesnt strike
me as particularly difficult to include, and I think a lot of people would
take to it easier than the current setup.
Where might I propose such a patch? I'd really love to do it myself, except
that I'm a perl hacker and don't know the C necessary.
Thanks,
alex
--
alex j. avriette
perl hacker.
a_avriette@acs.org
$dbh -> do('unhose');
I find the pg_hba.conf file to be frustrating in its configuration. I dont
see anywhere in the document itself that I would be able to use a netmask,
say:192.168/16
which I would find to be far easier than the current setup. It doesnt strike
me as particularly difficult to include, and I think a lot of people would
take to it easier than the current setup.Where might I propose such a patch? I'd really love to do it myself, except
that I'm a perl hacker and don't know the C necessary.
There is a clear "MASK" column in the pg_hba.conf file. Perhaps look at
the 7.2 version of the file as the documentation in it has been
improved.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026