Isn't "publication" wrongly defined here?

Started by PG Bug reporting formabout 8 years ago2 messagesdocs
Jump to latest
#1PG Bug reporting form
noreply@postgresql.org

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/logical-replication-publication.html
Description:

In section 31.1 it says "A publication is a set of changes generated from a
table or a group of tables"... that seems wrong. It's a set of relations,
tables, whatevers. No the changes themselves. Right?

#2David G. Johnston
david.g.johnston@gmail.com
In reply to: PG Bug reporting form (#1)
Re: Isn't "publication" wrongly defined here?

On Friday, April 27, 2018, PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
wrote:

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/logical-
replication-publication.html
Description:

In section 31.1 it says "A publication is a set of changes generated from a
table or a group of tables"... that seems wrong. It's a set of relations,
tables, whatevers. No the changes themselves. Right?

It's correct. The subscriber receives ongoing "events" which are the
logical changes to all tables defined within the publication. The items of
interest are the ongoing changes, the list of tables is just a table of
contents for which change sets are present.

David J.