Documentation does not cover multiple WITH in one query
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/queries-with.html
Description:
Hi. I have found
[DOC](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/queries-with.html)
it is fine, but did not cover multiple WITH in one query.
I found answer only [here](https://stackoverflow.com/a/38137037/4632019)
May you please add the example:
WITH table1 AS (...), table2 AS (...) SELECT * FROM table1, table2
thank you
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 09:24:52AM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/queries-with.html
Description:Hi. I have found
[DOC](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/queries-with.html)it is fine, but did not cover multiple WITH in one query.
I found answer only [here](https://stackoverflow.com/a/38137037/4632019)
May you please add the example:
WITH table1 AS (...), table2 AS (...) SELECT * FROM table1, table2
Well, the SELECT manual has:
[ WITH [ RECURSIVE ] with_query [, ...] ]
and with_query is shown as:
with_query_name [ ( column_name [, ...] ) ] AS ( select | values | insert | update | delete )
This is standard SQL. I don't think we are going to be able to show
every possible syntax.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
Thank you. That is I am looking for.
Never thought that 'WITH' syntax is described at 'SELECT'.
Will be very helpful if this will be mentioned on this page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/queries-with.html
For an example:
[ WITH [ RECURSIVE ] with_query [, ...] ]
and with_query is shown as:
with_query_name [ ( column_name [, ...] ) ] AS ( select | values | insert | update | delete )
For full syntax of `WITH` see https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/sql-select.html
Thanks.
24.08.2018, 23:30, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us>:
Show quoted text
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 09:24:52AM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/queries-with.html
Description:Hi. I have found
[DOC](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/queries-with.html)it is fine, but did not cover multiple WITH in one query.
I found answer only [here](https://stackoverflow.com/a/38137037/4632019)
May you please add the example:
WITH table1 AS (...), table2 AS (...) SELECT * FROM table1, table2
Well, the SELECT manual has:
[ WITH [ RECURSIVE ] with_query [, ...] ]
and with_query is shown as:
with_query_name [ ( column_name [, ...] ) ] AS ( select | values | insert | update | delete )
This is standard SQL. I don't think we are going to be able to show
every possible syntax.--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 12:08:15PM +0300, KES wrote:
Thank you. That is I am looking for.
Never thought that 'WITH' syntax is described at 'SELECT'.Will be very helpful if this will be mentioned on this page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/queries-with.html
For an example:[ WITH [ RECURSIVE ] with_query [, ...] ]
and with_query is shown as:
with_query_name [ ( column_name [, ...] ) ] AS ( select | values | insert | update | delete )
For full syntax of `WITH` see https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/sql-select.html
There is are no syntax layouts on this page or in similar sections in
the docs --- they are reserved for the reference pages. I don't think
it makes sense to add it here. One odd thing is that WITH can be used
with non-SELECT statements, but we only document it in SELECT, which is
odd. I think that is because the SQL standard only uses WITH with
SELECT.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +