Section 26.2.1. Planning wording
Section 26.2.1. Planning wording includes the following
"In any case the hardware architecture must be the same — shipping from, say, a 32-bit to a 64-bit system will not work."
would be more correct if it read as follows
"In any case the CPU architecture must be the same — shipping from, say, a 32-bit to a 64-bit system will not work."
as “hardware architecture” would imply the difference between say Dell and IBM which should be ok if the CPU is the same architecture ...
--
Regards
Theo Kramer
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 08:38:02AM +0200, Theo Kramer wrote:
Section 26.2.1. Planning wording includes the following
"In any case the hardware architecture must be the same — shipping from, say, a 32-bit to a 64-bit system will not work."
would be more correct if it read as follows
"In any case the CPU architecture must be the same — shipping from, say, a 32-bit to a 64-bit system will not work."
as “hardware architecture” would imply the difference between say Dell and IBM which should be ok if the CPU is the same architecture ...
I feel we might have cases where differences beyond the CPU might
matter, though I can't think of any now.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +