https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/typeconv-union-case.html

Started by PG Bug reporting formalmost 6 years ago2 messagesdocs
Jump to latest
#1PG Bug reporting form
noreply@postgresql.org

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/typeconv-union-case.html
Description:

I think it should be CAST instead of CASE.

#2David G. Johnston
david.g.johnston@gmail.com
In reply to: PG Bug reporting form (#1)
Re: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/typeconv-union-case.html

On Tuesday, May 12, 2020, PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
wrote:

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/typeconv-union-case.html
Description:

I think it should be CAST instead of CASE.

Why? There no “process” needed to perform type conversion using cast.

David J.