broken link to "SELinux guide" from sepgsql
Hello,
on https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sepgsql.html
the "SELinux User's and Administrator's Guide" link to
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/SELinux_Users_and_Administrators_Guide/
is broken, leads to 404.
Proper URI would be, apparently,
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/selinux_users_and_administrators_guide/index
--
Anton Voloshin
Postgres Professional, The Russian Postgres Company
https://postgrespro.ru
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 02:01:24PM +0700, Anton Voloshin wrote:
on https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sepgsql.html
the "SELinux User's and Administrator's Guide" link to https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/SELinux_Users_and_Administrators_Guide/
is broken, leads to 404.Proper URI would be, apparently,
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/selinux_users_and_administrators_guide/index
Indeed, that's broken. Will fix as per your suggestion.
--
Michael
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 05:09:41PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
Indeed, that's broken. Will fix as per your suggestion.
And done down to 10 as of cc1853b. 9.6 used a different link that was
already dead, and this version will be EOL'd soon, so I did not bother
changing it.
--
Michael
On 28 Oct 2021, at 02:28, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 05:09:41PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
Indeed, that's broken. Will fix as per your suggestion.
And done down to 10 as of cc1853b. 9.6 used a different link that was
already dead, and this version will be EOL'd soon, so I did not bother
changing it.
The document linked to from 9.6 was at some point 301 redirected to the below
URL, and later the redirect was no longer maintained.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/13/html/Security-Enhanced_Linux/
AFAICT it's the same document, but updated. If we want to leave 9.6 in as much
of a working state as possible I think it makes sense to change to that one.
I'm happy to do it if you concur.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 01:34:40PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
AFAICT it's the same document, but updated. If we want to leave 9.6 in as much
of a working state as possible I think it makes sense to change to that one.
I'm happy to do it if you concur.
Sure. That's fine by me.
--
Michael
On 28 Oct 2021, at 14:37, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 01:34:40PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
AFAICT it's the same document, but updated. If we want to leave 9.6 in as much
of a working state as possible I think it makes sense to change to that one.
I'm happy to do it if you concur.Sure. That's fine by me.
Applied. Turns out that according to archive.org, the links in the 9.6 docs
were redirecting to the URL I referenced already by the time of the initial
sepgsql commit. Now we'll at least avoid 404's on those when we freeze the
docs in time.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/