bad style for SECURITY DEFINER

Started by Justin Pryzbyover 4 years ago9 messagesdocs
Jump to latest
#1Justin Pryzby
pryzby@telsasoft.com

The title of this section looks poor in the first two web browsers I tried.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createfunction.html#id-1.9.3.67.10.2
| Writing SECURITY DEFINER Functions Safely

It looks like it may be the only <literal> tag within a <refsect1>.

The PDF looks fine.

--
Justin

#2Peter Eisentraut
peter_e@gmx.net
In reply to: Justin Pryzby (#1)
Re: bad style for SECURITY DEFINER

On 13.12.21 01:17, Justin Pryzby wrote:

The title of this section looks poor in the first two web browsers I tried.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createfunction.html#id-1.9.3.67.10.2
| Writing SECURITY DEFINER Functions Safely

This appears to be a web site styling issue. It looks more reasonable
when I use the default style.

#3Daniel Gustafsson
daniel@yesql.se
In reply to: Peter Eisentraut (#2)
Re: bad style for SECURITY DEFINER

On 13 Dec 2021, at 11:35, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

On 13.12.21 01:17, Justin Pryzby wrote:

The title of this section looks poor in the first two web browsers I tried.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createfunction.html#id-1.9.3.67.10.2
| Writing SECURITY DEFINER Functions Safely

This appears to be a web site styling issue. It looks more reasonable when I use the default style.

Agreed, the <code> class should not override the font size of the <h2> and
should have a different margin than when rendered elsewhere. It's not entirely
clear to me why we set a font-size at all, I can't see which case that's
supposed to be fixing but my CSS is really rusty so I'm sure to be missing
something. However, this should be moved to -www where it can be dealt with.

--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/

#4Justin Pryzby
pryzby@telsasoft.com
In reply to: Daniel Gustafsson (#3)
Re: bad style for SECURITY DEFINER

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 02:11:24PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:

On 13 Dec 2021, at 11:35, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

On 13.12.21 01:17, Justin Pryzby wrote:

The title of this section looks poor in the first two web browsers I tried.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createfunction.html#id-1.9.3.67.10.2
| Writing SECURITY DEFINER Functions Safely

This appears to be a web site styling issue. It looks more reasonable when I use the default style.

Agreed, the <code> class should not override the font size of the <h2> and
should have a different margin than when rendered elsewhere. It's not entirely
clear to me why we set a font-size at all, I can't see which case that's
supposed to be fixing but my CSS is really rusty so I'm sure to be missing
something. However, this should be moved to -www where it can be dealt with.

So done.

#5Jonathan S. Katz
jkatz@postgresql.org
In reply to: Justin Pryzby (#4)
Re: bad style for SECURITY DEFINER

On 12/13/21 9:01 AM, Justin Pryzby wrote:

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 02:11:24PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:

On 13 Dec 2021, at 11:35, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

On 13.12.21 01:17, Justin Pryzby wrote:

The title of this section looks poor in the first two web browsers I tried.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createfunction.html#id-1.9.3.67.10.2
| Writing SECURITY DEFINER Functions Safely

The below seems to do the trick. Tested in Chrome, FF, and Safari.
Screenshot attached.

If no objections I'll push the patch tomorrow.

Thanks,

Jonathan

diff --git a/media/css/main.css b/media/css/main.css
index d97da4d..955f612 100644
--- a/media/css/main.css
+++ b/media/css/main.css
@@ -877,6 +877,10 @@ code,
    font-size: inherit !important;
  }
+#docContent h2 code {
+  margin: 0.5em;
+}
+
  #docContent .NAVHEADER table th,
  #docContent .navheader table th {
    text-align: center;

Attachments:

Screen Shot 2021-12-13 at 4.32.24 PM.pngimage/png; name="Screen Shot 2021-12-13 at 4.32.24 PM.png"Download
#6Daniel Gustafsson
daniel@yesql.se
In reply to: Jonathan S. Katz (#5)
Re: bad style for SECURITY DEFINER

On 13 Dec 2021, at 22:33, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:

On 12/13/21 9:01 AM, Justin Pryzby wrote:

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 02:11:24PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:

On 13 Dec 2021, at 11:35, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

On 13.12.21 01:17, Justin Pryzby wrote:

The title of this section looks poor in the first two web browsers I tried.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createfunction.html#id-1.9.3.67.10.2
| Writing SECURITY DEFINER Functions Safely

The below seems to do the trick. Tested in Chrome, FF, and Safari. Screenshot attached.

If no objections I'll push the patch tomorrow.

The margin issue looks right but I think the font-size should match the rest of
the title.

--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/

#7Jonathan S. Katz
jkatz@postgresql.org
In reply to: Daniel Gustafsson (#6)
Re: bad style for SECURITY DEFINER

On 12/13/21 4:43 PM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:

The margin issue looks right but I think the font-size should match the rest of
the title.

Please see attached and below for revision.

I'm not thrilled about the !important override that's needed to deal
with another !important, but I don't want to try to unweave the
!important nest given the lack of overall cases of a code block nested
within h2 title tags.

Jonathan

diff --git a/media/css/main.css b/media/css/main.css
index d97da4d..e7b1455 100644
--- a/media/css/main.css
+++ b/media/css/main.css
@@ -877,6 +877,14 @@ code,
    font-size: inherit !important;
  }
+#docContent h2 code {
+  font-size: inherit !important;
+  margin-bottom: 0em;
+  margin-left: 0.5em;
+  margin-right: 0.5em;
+  margin-top: 0em;
+}
+
  #docContent .NAVHEADER table th,
  #docContent .navheader table th {
    text-align: center;

Attachments:

Screen Shot 2021-12-13 at 5.12.29 PM.pngimage/png; name="Screen Shot 2021-12-13 at 5.12.29 PM.png"Download+2-0
#8Daniel Gustafsson
daniel@yesql.se
In reply to: Jonathan S. Katz (#7)
Re: bad style for SECURITY DEFINER

On 13 Dec 2021, at 23:14, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:

On 12/13/21 4:43 PM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:

The margin issue looks right but I think the font-size should match the rest of
the title.

Please see attached and below for revision.

I think this looks much better, and it matches how the PDF's are rendered.

I'm not thrilled about the !important override that's needed to deal with another !important, but I don't want to try to unweave the !important nest given the lack of overall cases of a code block nested within h2 title tags.

Agreed on both counts.

--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/

#9Jonathan S. Katz
jkatz@postgresql.org
In reply to: Daniel Gustafsson (#8)
Re: bad style for SECURITY DEFINER

On 12/14/21 4:27 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:

On 13 Dec 2021, at 23:14, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:

On 12/13/21 4:43 PM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:

The margin issue looks right but I think the font-size should match the rest of
the title.

Please see attached and below for revision.

I think this looks much better, and it matches how the PDF's are rendered.

I'm not thrilled about the !important override that's needed to deal with another !important, but I don't want to try to unweave the !important nest given the lack of overall cases of a code block nested within h2 title tags.

Agreed on both counts.

Thanks for the review, and thanks to Justin for the report. I've pushed
this up. It should be available on the next cache refresh.

Thanks,

Jonathan