"(process)" is missing for some terms about process in glossary

Started by Fujii Masaoover 4 years ago3 messagesdocs
Jump to latest
#1Fujii Masao
masao.fujii@gmail.com

Hi,

In glossary, the title of each term about process seems to consist of the process name and "(process)", e.g., Checkpointer (process). But I found that "(process)" is missing for the following three terms about process. Attached is the patch to add "(process)" to them.

- Auxiliary process
- Startup process
- WAL receiver

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

Attachments:

glossary-process_v1.patchtext/plain; charset=UTF-8; name=glossary-process_v1.patchDownload+3-3
#2Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Fujii Masao (#1)
Re: "(process)" is missing for some terms about process in glossary

Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> writes:

In glossary, the title of each term about process seems to consist of the process name and "(process)", e.g., Checkpointer (process). But I found that "(process)" is missing for the following three terms about process. Attached is the patch to add "(process)" to them.

- Auxiliary process
- Startup process
- WAL receiver

I think "Auxiliary process (process)" is redundant to the point
of being silly. +1 for addiing it to "WAL receiver", though,
since that's not obviously a process.

regards, tom lane

#3Fujii Masao
masao.fujii@gmail.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#2)
Re: "(process)" is missing for some terms about process in glossary

On 2022/01/08 1:41, Tom Lane wrote:

Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> writes:

In glossary, the title of each term about process seems to consist of the process name and "(process)", e.g., Checkpointer (process). But I found that "(process)" is missing for the following three terms about process. Attached is the patch to add "(process)" to them.

- Auxiliary process
- Startup process
- WAL receiver

I think "Auxiliary process (process)" is redundant to the point
of being silly. +1 for addiing it to "WAL receiver", though,
since that's not obviously a process.

Yes, you're right. So I pushed the patch that adds "(process)"
only to the glossary term "WAL receiver". Thanks!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION