hot standby <-> Hot Standby
Hi,
which rules do we follow for writing hot standby? Looking here:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/hot-standby.html
... it does not seem to be consistent. We have "Hot Standby" and "hot standby" mixed throughout the page, e.g.
"If a hot standby processes"
"If the standby is not a hot standby"
"There are several limitations of Hot Standby"
"it might not be possible to re-enter Hot Standby"
Regards,
Daniel
"Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com> writes:
which rules do we follow for writing hot standby?
The original author liked to capitalize it, but that's since been
followed only intermittently. Personally I'd just as soon lose
the caps.
regards, tom lane
"Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com> writes:
which rules do we follow for writing hot standby?
The original author liked to capitalize it, but that's since been
followed only intermittently. Personally I'd just as soon lose
the caps.
Works for me, as long as it is consistent.
Regards
Daniel