8.5.2 "integral" - "integer"
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/datatype-datetime.html
Description:
I think, the "integer" will be good choice instead "integral'":
8.5.2
...
"The offset will be shown as hh (hours only) if it is an integral number of
hours, else as hh:mm if it is an integral number of minutes, else as
hh:mm:ss. (The third case is not possible with any modern"
PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
I think, the "integer" will be good choice instead "integral'":
8.5.2
...
"The offset will be shown as hh (hours only) if it is an integral number of
hours, else as hh:mm if it is an integral number of minutes, else as
hh:mm:ss. (The third case is not possible with any modern"
"Integral" seems like perfectly good English to me here.
regards, tom lane
On Saturday, January 7, 2023, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
I think, the "integer" will be good choice instead "integral'":
8.5.2
...
"The offset will be shown as hh (hours only) if it is an integral numberof
hours, else as hh:mm if it is an integral number of minutes, else as
hh:mm:ss. (The third case is not possible with any modern""Integral" seems like perfectly good English to me here.
Even if technically correct I’d probably go with integer in deference to
non-native speakers and the fact that integral has two other much more
commonly used meanings than as a synonym for integer.
David J.