8.5.2 "integral" - "integer"

Started by PG Bug reporting formover 3 years ago3 messagesdocs
Jump to latest
#1PG Bug reporting form
noreply@postgresql.org

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/datatype-datetime.html
Description:

I think, the "integer" will be good choice instead "integral'":
8.5.2
...
"The offset will be shown as hh (hours only) if it is an integral number of
hours, else as hh:mm if it is an integral number of minutes, else as
hh:mm:ss. (The third case is not possible with any modern"

#2Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: PG Bug reporting form (#1)
Re: 8.5.2 "integral" - "integer"

PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:

I think, the "integer" will be good choice instead "integral'":
8.5.2
...
"The offset will be shown as hh (hours only) if it is an integral number of
hours, else as hh:mm if it is an integral number of minutes, else as
hh:mm:ss. (The third case is not possible with any modern"

"Integral" seems like perfectly good English to me here.

regards, tom lane

#3David G. Johnston
david.g.johnston@gmail.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#2)
Re: 8.5.2 "integral" - "integer"

On Saturday, January 7, 2023, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:

I think, the "integer" will be good choice instead "integral'":
8.5.2
...
"The offset will be shown as hh (hours only) if it is an integral number

of

hours, else as hh:mm if it is an integral number of minutes, else as
hh:mm:ss. (The third case is not possible with any modern"

"Integral" seems like perfectly good English to me here.

Even if technically correct I’d probably go with integer in deference to
non-native speakers and the fact that integral has two other much more
commonly used meanings than as a synonym for integer.

David J.