Not clear spelling about transaction

Started by PG Bug reporting formover 2 years ago2 messagesdocs
Jump to latest
#1PG Bug reporting form
noreply@postgresql.org

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/continuous-archiving.html
Description:

No committed transactions will be lost

Hello. It is not clear to me. Did you mean:
Not committed transactions will be lost
Or
None of committed transactions will be lost
?

It would be simpler if you write that explicitly:
All committed transactions will not be lost.

#2David G. Johnston
david.g.johnston@gmail.com
In reply to: PG Bug reporting form (#1)
Re: Not clear spelling about transaction

On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 1:07 PM PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
wrote:

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/continuous-archiving.html
Description:

No committed transactions will be lost

Hello. It is not clear to me. Did you mean:
Not committed transactions will be lost
Or
None of committed transactions will be lost
?

It would be simpler if you write that explicitly:
All committed transactions will not be lost.

"Committed transactions will not be lost."

The word "No" means "none", it doesn't mean "not".

David J.