JDBC

Started by Enrico Cominiover 25 years ago6 messagesgeneral
Jump to latest
#1Enrico Comini
algobit@algobit.com

Scuse me
I am interesting in a COMPILED debugged version of JDBC driver for 7.02
(driver for J 1.2,1.2 and1.3).
Thanks,
Enrico

#2Peter T Mount
peter@retep.org.uk
In reply to: Enrico Comini (#1)
Re: JDBC

Due to me moving home and my day job taking precedence, I've not had chance to do anything since 7.0, so there is no difference between 7.0, and 7.0.2.

I'm working though the backlog of patches & bug fixes at the moment. I had hoped to have something online last night, but I'm still having problems with my internet connection at home (I'm currently replying via the works connection), so it's been held back.

As soon as I have something useful (unless a disaster occurs it should be this week), I'll be posting an announcement on the lists.

Peter

--
Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk, me@petermount.com
Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk Contact details: http://petermount.com
PostgreSQL JDBC: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/
----- Original Message -----
From: Enrico Comini
To: ML-Postrges-general
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 10:05 AM
Subject: [GENERAL] JDBC

Scuse me
I am interesting in a COMPILED debugged version of JDBC driver for 7.02 (driver for J 1.2,1.2 and1.3).
Thanks,
Enrico

#3Travis Bauer
trbauer@cs.indiana.edu
In reply to: Enrico Comini (#1)
RE: JDBC

Maybe we should put up a copy of the JDBC driver that's in the CVS.
absolute, relative, and first are broken in the released versions of the
driver. I had some patches applied that fixed these and this version in the
CVS. I think some other changes have been made as well. Should it be made
available, at least in compiled form?

Travis
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner@hub.org [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@hub.org]On
Behalf Of Enrico Comini
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 4:05 AM
To: ML-Postrges-general
Subject: [GENERAL] JDBC

Scuse me
I am interesting in a COMPILED debugged version of JDBC driver for 7.02
(driver for J 1.2,1.2 and1.3).
Thanks,
Enrico

#4Peter T Mount
peter@retep.org.uk
In reply to: Travis Bauer (#3)
Re: JDBC

Nothing has changed since 7.0 was released, so the binaries on www.retep.org.uk/postgres are the current version.

The compiled form has been available online for at least 3 years now.

Peter

--
Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk, me@petermount.com
Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk Contact details: http://petermount.com
PostgreSQL JDBC: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/
----- Original Message -----
From: Travis Bauer
To: algobit@algobit.com ; ML-Postrges-general
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 12:14 PM
Subject: RE: [GENERAL] JDBC

Maybe we should put up a copy of the JDBC driver that's in the CVS. absolute, relative, and first are broken in the released versions of the driver. I had some patches applied that fixed these and this version in the CVS. I think some other changes have been made as well. Should it be made available, at least in compiled form?

Travis
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner@hub.org [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@hub.org]On Behalf Of Enrico Comini
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 4:05 AM
To: ML-Postrges-general
Subject: [GENERAL] JDBC

Scuse me
I am interesting in a COMPILED debugged version of JDBC driver for 7.02 (driver for J 1.2,1.2 and1.3).
Thanks,
Enrico

#5Travis Bauer
trbauer@cs.indiana.edu
In reply to: Peter T Mount (#4)
Re: JDBC

That's not true. Look at the cvs log for
src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc2/ResultSet.java

There are entries for June 7 and June 9. These are changes I made to
ResultSet.java to make it more JDBC2 compliant. These changes are not
in the 7.0.2 release, and the functions I mentioned in the
previous posting do not work properly in the current release.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Travis Bauer | CS Grad Student | IU |www.cs.indiana.edu/~trbauer
----------------------------------------------------------------

On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Peter Mount wrote:

Show quoted text

Nothing has changed since 7.0 was released, so the binaries on www.retep.org.uk/postgres are the current> The compiled form has been available online for at least 3 years now.

Peter

#6Peter T Mount
peter@retep.org.uk
In reply to: Travis Bauer (#5)
Re: JDBC

Ah, just checked. Bruce applied those changes.

I'm thinking we may have the same problem I had with 6.5.3, the changes were
in cvs, but didn't get out to the release. Marc, any ideas?

Peter

--
Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk, me@petermount.com
Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk Contact details: http://petermount.com
PostgreSQL JDBC: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/
Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Travis Bauer" <trbauer@cs.indiana.edu>
To: "Peter Mount" <peter@retep.org.uk>
Cc: <algobit@algobit.com>; "ML-Postrges-general"
<Pgsql-General@postgresql.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] JDBC

That's not true. Look at the cvs log for
src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc2/ResultSet.java

There are entries for June 7 and June 9. These are changes I made to
ResultSet.java to make it more JDBC2 compliant. These changes are not
in the 7.0.2 release, and the functions I mentioned in the
previous posting do not work properly in the current release.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Travis Bauer | CS Grad Student | IU |www.cs.indiana.edu/~trbauer
----------------------------------------------------------------

On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Peter Mount wrote:

Nothing has changed since 7.0 was released, so the binaries on

www.retep.org.uk/postgres are the current> The compiled form has been
available online for at least 3 years now.

Show quoted text

Peter