Int8 problem
Hi
I have intalled Postgres 7.0.2 on a Compaq Alpha with DigitalUnix.
If I insert a bigger number like 10^13 in an int8 type field i'm getting no
error messages, no warnings, but if I check the value inserted i receive
totaly wrong number like 2543........
If you have any suggestions please let me know.
Thank any way.
"admin" <admin@mmelectrica.ro> writes:
I have intalled Postgres 7.0.2 on a Compaq Alpha with DigitalUnix.
If I insert a bigger number like 10^13 in an int8 type field i'm getting no
error messages, no warnings, but if I check the value inserted i receive
totaly wrong number like 2543........
Hm. It sounds like configure failed to find any compiler support for
8-byte ints, so it gave up and compiled int8 as int4. But an Alpha
ought to have 8-byte ints. May we see the output files from configure
(config.status, config.log)?
regards, tom lane
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "admin" <admin@mmelectrica.ro>
Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: 26 septembrie 2000 16:31
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Int8 problem
I send you the outputs maybe you will find an answer.
Thanks.
Hanos Felix
"admin" <admin@mmelectrica.ro> writes:
I have intalled Postgres 7.0.2 on a Compaq Alpha with DigitalUnix.
If I insert a bigger number like 10^13 in an int8 type field i'm
getting no
Show quoted text
error messages, no warnings, but if I check the value inserted i receive
totaly wrong number like 2543........Hm. It sounds like configure failed to find any compiler support for
8-byte ints, so it gave up and compiled int8 as int4. But an Alpha
ought to have 8-byte ints. May we see the output files from configure
(config.status, config.log)?regards, tom lane
"admin" <admin@mmelectrica.ro> writes:
But on the alpha i got no error message no worning and inserts a wrong
number if the number is bigger than 10^13 .
10^13? But values > 2^31 work? Man, that's really weird ... I was
expecting a failure at 2^31 if int8 wasn't compiled correctly.
I can't think what might fail at 10^13. Ideas anyone?
It might help to see an exact table of equivalences, ie, so much
in, so much out.
regards, tom lane
Import Notes
Reply to msg id not found: 00e101c02851$49f61560$1001a8c0@mmelectrica.ro
Hi,
I have intalled Postgres 7.0.2 recently on 3 normal PC with RedHat and
Slackware to try its behavior
but its working good.
int8 thakes number much bigger then 10^13.
And if the number is to big (about 10^19 ) it generate an error message
(ERROR: int8 value out of range: ...) and don't insert it into the table.
But on the alpha i got no error message no worning and inserts a wrong
number if the number is bigger than 10^13 .
regard Hanos Felix
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jerome Raupach" <jraupach@intelcom.fr>
To: "admin" <admin@mmelectrica.ro>
Sent: 26 septembrie 2000 14:48
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Int8 problem
your number is truncated to the biggest int8 ( 2*10^10, I think).
try with 'numeric'.Jerome.
admin wrote:
Hi
I have intalled Postgres 7.0.2 on a Compaq Alpha with DigitalUnix.
If I insert a bigger number like 10^13 in an int8 type field i'm
getting no
Show quoted text
error messages, no warnings, but if I check the value inserted i receive
totaly wrong number like 2543........
If you have any suggestions please let me know.Thank any way.
Tom your right.
I take a detailed look at it and it fails exactly at 2^31 .
2^31-1 = 2147483647 --> 2147483647
2^31 = 2147483648 --> -2147483648
2^31+1= 2147483649 --> -2147483647
.....
10^10 --> 1410065408
10^12 --> -727379968
...
But how could i compile the int8 corectly?
- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "admin" <admin@mmelectrica.ro>
Cc: "Jerome Raupach" <jraupach@intelcom.fr>; <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: 27 septembrie 2000 08:43
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Int8 problem
Show quoted text
"admin" <admin@mmelectrica.ro> writes:
But on the alpha i got no error message no worning and inserts a wrong
number if the number is bigger than 10^13 .10^13? But values > 2^31 work? Man, that's really weird ... I was
expecting a failure at 2^31 if int8 wasn't compiled correctly.
I can't think what might fail at 10^13. Ideas anyone?It might help to see an exact table of equivalences, ie, so much
in, so much out.regards, tom lane