pgsql for Python
Has anybody used http://sourceforge.net/projects/pgsql ?
I maintain production system based on Python and PostgreSQL.
I currently use PoPy, but for a few reasons it doesn't satysfy me fully.
The pgsql seems OK at first sight (especially libpq-to-Python API) but
for the production system I need Python DB API 2.0 compliant library.
Has anybody tested it yet? What is the status of PostgreSQL 7.1
compliance for today?
Any Python geeks out here? ;-)
bye
--
Marek P�tlicki <marpet@buy.pl>
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, [iso-8859-2] Marek P���tlicki wrote:
Has anybody used http://sourceforge.net/projects/pgsql ?
I maintain production system based on Python and PostgreSQL.I currently use PoPy, but for a few reasons it doesn't satysfy me fully.
The pgsql seems OK at first sight (especially libpq-to-Python API) but
for the production system I need Python DB API 2.0 compliant library.
Has anybody tested it yet? What is the status of PostgreSQL 7.1
compliance for today?Any Python geeks out here? ;-)
Partially a Python geek here.
I use PoPy and think it's dandy. I also thought it *was* the DB API 2.0--
am I mistaken here?
PyGreSQL is more commonly used, and has (IMHO) a simpler, more dict-like
interface, but isn't (AFAIK) thread-safe, nor DB API compliant.
--
Joel Burton <jburton@scw.org>
Director of Information Systems, Support Center of Washington
Joel Burton wrote:
PyGreSQL is more commonly used, and has (IMHO) a simpler, more dict-like
interface, but isn't (AFAIK) thread-safe, nor DB API compliant.
I wrote a small web application server in python (www.lloop.com) using
Python and PyGreSQL. PyGreSQL was (mostly) thread safe, in practice, when
I started using it. I did a little bit of concurrency testing, found a few
uninitialized variables in the PyGreSQL module that caused crashes, but
these were easily fixed. If by thread-safe you mean a connection can be
safely shared between multiple concurrent threads, I don't know what to say
(never tried that). Pooling PyGreSQL connections and checking them in and
out to Python threads seemed to work well.
I haven't done much Python work lately, so I haven't tried PoPy (it sounds
nice).
--
Shaw Terwilliger <sterwill@sourcegear.com>
SourceGear Corporation
217.356.0105 x 641
On Friday, March, 2001-03-02 at 14:16:02, Joel Burton wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, [iso-8859-2] Marek P�tlicki wrote:
Has anybody used http://sourceforge.net/projects/pgsql ?
I maintain production system based on Python and PostgreSQL.I currently use PoPy, but for a few reasons it doesn't satysfy me fully.
The pgsql seems OK at first sight (especially libpq-to-Python API) but
for the production system I need Python DB API 2.0 compliant library.
Has anybody tested it yet? What is the status of PostgreSQL 7.1
compliance for today?Any Python geeks out here? ;-)
Partially a Python geek here.
I use PoPy and think it's dandy. I also thought it *was* the DB API 2.0--
am I mistaken here?
yes, it _is_ compliant, when complaining about compatibility I meant
pgsql's libpq-to-Python API, which in my opinion is very cool thing (but
as I said I need DB API 2.0).
What I don't like in PoPy is its oversimplistic approach towards more
complex types in PostgreSQL. Returning Numerics as strings for example
is a little bit too much for me...
PyGreSQL is more commonly used, and has (IMHO) a simpler, more dict-like
interface, but isn't (AFAIK) thread-safe, nor DB API compliant.
yes, it is commonly used partly because it is distributed together with
PostgreSQL :-)
Anyway I must say, after a few glances at http://sourceforge.net/projects/pgsql
that it is very interesting project, especially because of its better
support of PostgreSQL types (like Numeric, Money or arrays), aspecially
better from PoPy, which I have most experience with. A few
improvements should be added to it though to make it really the best
PostgreSQL API for Python, IMO.
regards
--
Marek P�tlicki <marpet@buy.pl>
I use PoPy and think it's dandy. I also thought it *was* the
DB API 2.0--
am I mistaken here?
I noticed a couple posts asking for PoPy RPMs so I created some and posted
them below if anyone is interested.
http://www.linuxshare.com/popy/
Brent
Import Notes
Resolved by subject fallback
"Brent R. Matzelle" wrote:
I use PoPy and think it's dandy. I also thought it *was* the
DB API 2.0--
am I mistaken here?
I noticed a couple posts asking for PoPy RPMs so I created some and posted
them below if anyone is interested.
What's the difference between PoPy and the PygreSQL driver included in
the PostgreSQL distribution? Just curious.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
What's the difference between PoPy and the PygreSQL driver
included in
the PostgreSQL distribution? Just curious.
Several things actually. PyGreSQL is a C module and two Python
script files, while PoPy is built entirely as a C module which
should mean more speed. PoPy is Python DB API 2.0 compliant
(http://www.python.org/topics/database/DatabaseAPI-2.0.html)
which is the equivalent of JDBC for Java and DBI for Perl.
PyGreSQL is not compliant. PoPy is threadsafe, while PyGreSQL
is not.
Brent
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/