Why SELECT OWNER.TABLENAME.COLUMNNAME not working ?
Can anybody tell me why i can't specify OWNER then i select a pack of tuples
?
If i set only TABLENAME.COLUMNNAME all is work, but when i adding to this
OWNER it's fail.
"Zuev Dmitry" wrote:
Can anybody tell me why i can't specify OWNER then i select a pack of tuples
?
If i set only TABLENAME.COLUMNNAME all is work, but when i adding to this
OWNER it's fail.
This syntax is not (yet) supported.
If it were supported, the first element (according to SQL specs) would be
SCHEMA not OWNER, though I suppose by implication they might be the same.
--
Oliver Elphick Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
PGP: 1024R/32B8FAA1: 97 EA 1D 47 72 3F 28 47 6B 7E 39 CC 56 E4 C1 47
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
========================================
"The LORD is my light and my salvation; whom shall I
fear? the LORD is the strength of my life; of whom
shall I be afraid?" Psalms 27:1
Hello everyone,
in Postgresql RDBMS ,
how can i get informations about acces permissions on existing objects
?
I alredy know that ( psql \z ) do this ;
but 'w' means update OR delete ! (it's not the same thing)
can someone , please, tell me if it is possible ?
thanks a lot
Hi
I guess this is because postgresql doesnt yet support the concept of
schemas. Such a select statement will make sense when the database
supports schemas..
Hope this helps
Anand
Show quoted text
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 03:01:42PM +0600, Zuev Dmitry wrote:
Can anybody tell me why i can't specify OWNER then i select a pack of tuples
?
If i set only TABLENAME.COLUMNNAME all is work, but when i adding to this
OWNER it's fail.---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly