interbase v postgresql

Started by Richard Haywardover 24 years ago2 messagesgeneral
Jump to latest
#1Richard Hayward
richard@tortoise.demon.co.uk

I have an application on MSSQL and am wanting rewrite it using open
source software.

What would people here consider the strengths and weaknesses of these
two?

The things I need are:

Salability to hundreds of concurrent users.

Stored procedures. This seems to rule out mySQL. Which product has the
fullest procedure language?

I want two types of interface. Access via a browser or via client
software applications.

For web based access, I envisage using perl. Which product has the
most stable modules to connect to perl?

My client apps are written in Delphi. Although I've yet to get serious
with it, I think I can use IB objects to produce thin-client delphi
apps talking to Interbase, needing little to be installed on the
client machines. With postgresql I think I have to use ODBC. Any
reasons why one is better than the other?

For clients connecting across the Internet, traffic would have to be
encrypted. Could I achieve this with either product?

With MSSQL I really like the Trace utility. I can watch the SQL
commands as they arrive at the server. I understand from an earlier
post that this isn't possible with Interbase/Firebird. Can I do that
with postgresql?

Does anyone have opinions on this?
There is a bit of information on the project itself at www.openi.org.

regards
Richard

also posted to borland.public.interbase.general
richard@tortoise.demon.co.uk

#2Andrew Gould
andrewgould@yahoo.com
In reply to: Richard Hayward (#1)
Re: interbase v postgresql

I can't address the issues you list here; but the
following may matter to you:

Interbase can import fixed-width text files, but not
delimited files.

Since I'm importing and remodelling data from
delimited files on a regular basis, this issue was
important to me. Converting delimited files to
fixed-width is not how I want to spend my time.

Best of luck,

Andrew

--- Richard Hayward <richard@tortoise.demon.co.uk>
wrote:

I have an application on MSSQL and am wanting
rewrite it using open
source software.

What would people here consider the strengths and
weaknesses of these
two?

The things I need are:

Salability to hundreds of concurrent users.

Stored procedures. This seems to rule out mySQL.
Which product has the
fullest procedure language?

I want two types of interface. Access via a browser
or via client
software applications.

For web based access, I envisage using perl. Which
product has the
most stable modules to connect to perl?

My client apps are written in Delphi. Although I've
yet to get serious
with it, I think I can use IB objects to produce
thin-client delphi
apps talking to Interbase, needing little to be
installed on the
client machines. With postgresql I think I have to
use ODBC. Any
reasons why one is better than the other?

For clients connecting across the Internet, traffic
would have to be
encrypted. Could I achieve this with either product?

With MSSQL I really like the Trace utility. I can
watch the SQL
commands as they arrive at the server. I understand
from an earlier
post that this isn't possible with
Interbase/Firebird. Can I do that
with postgresql?

Does anyone have opinions on this?
There is a bit of information on the project itself
at www.openi.org.

regards
Richard

also posted to borland.public.interbase.general
richard@tortoise.demon.co.uk

---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to

majordomo@postgresql.org

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com