R: [SQL] UPDATE and SELECT result difference

Started by Enrico Manganoabout 24 years ago2 messagesgeneral
Jump to latest
#1Enrico Mangano
enrico.mangano@nethouse.it

Thank you, Jean-Luc!

But now I would have another question about this:

cod | campo1
-----+---------
1 | valore1
(1 row)

cod | campo2
-----+---------
1 | valore2
1 | valore3
1 | valore4

targhettariodb=# update tab_test1 set campo1 = tab_test2.campo2 where
tab_test1.cod = tab_test2.cod;
UPDATE 1
targhettariodb=# select * from tab_test1;
cod | campo1
-----+---------
1 | valore3
(1 row)

I think the value it has chosen is random, isn't it?
So I can't have any control on it.

The UPDATE query above is semantically equivalent to this:
update tab_test1 set campo1 = (select campo2 from tab_test2, tab_test1
where tab_test1.cod = tab_test2.cod);
And this query(IMHO in a correct way) return an ERROR:
targhettariodb=# update tab_test1 set campo1 = (select campo2 from
tab_test2, tab_test1 where tab_test1.cod = tab_test2.cod);
ERROR: More than one tuple returned by a subselect used as an
expression.

Isn't this an incongruence in SQL?

Thanks,
Enrico.

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Jean-Luc Lachance [mailto:jllachan@nsd.ca]
Inviato: giovedì 14 marzo 2002 19.47
A: Enrico Mangano
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Oggetto: Re: [GENERAL] UPDATE and SELECT result difference

Hello Enrico,

It simply means that there are 202 duplicate rows in acxx_aziende_istat
where acxx_aziende_istat.cda_azienda = temp_principale.cda_azienda.

try :

SELECT cda_azienda, COUNT(*)
FROM acxx_aziende_istat
WHERE EXISTS (
SELECT * FROM temp_principale
WHERE acxx_aziende_istat.cda_azienda = temp_principale.cda_azienda)
GROUP BY cda_azienda
HAVING COUNT(*) > 1;

jll

Enrico Mangano wrote:

Show quoted text

Hi all,

of course I'm too drunk, or simply I'm missing something, but
I can't understand the difference beetwen the results of these
2 queries:

targhettariodb=# UPDATE temp_principale
targhettariodb-# SET cda_istat = acxx_aziende_istat.cda_istat ,
targhettariodb-# prg_istat = acxx_aziende_istat.prg_istat
targhettariodb-# WHERE acxx_aziende_istat.cda_azienda =
temp_principale.cda_azienda;
UPDATE 1727
targhettariodb=# SELECT count(*)
targhettariodb-# FROM acxx_aziende_istat,temp_principale
targhettariodb-# WHERE acxx_aziende_istat.cda_azienda =
temp_principale.cda_azienda;
count
-------
1929
(1 row)

why this difference in the number of rows?

(
targhettariodb=# SELECT count(*)
targhettariodb-# FROM acxx_aziende_istat, temp_principale
targhettariodb-# WHERE
targhettariodb-# acxx_aziende_istat.cda_azienda is null OR
targhettariodb-# temp_principale.cda_azienda is null OR
targhettariodb-# acxx_aziende_istat.cda_istat IS NULL OR
targhettariodb-# acxx_aziende_istat.prg_istat IS NULL ;
count
-------
0

#2Jean-Luc Lachance
jllachan@nsd.ca
In reply to: Enrico Mangano (#1)
Re: R: [SQL] UPDATE and SELECT result difference

Hello again Enrico,

Your first UPDATE will update 1 record 3 times; there is only one record
updated.
The second UPDATE is not equivalant and will return an error as the
sub-select should not return more than one tuple.

But, you can write:

UPDATE tab_test1
SET campo1 = (
SELECT campo2
FROM tab_test2
WHERE tab_test1.cod = tab_test2.cod
ORDER BY campo2
LIMIT 1);

jll

Enrico Mangano wrote:

Show quoted text

Thank you, Jean-Luc!

But now I would have another question about this:

cod | campo1
-----+---------
1 | valore1
(1 row)

cod | campo2
-----+---------
1 | valore2
1 | valore3
1 | valore4

targhettariodb=# update tab_test1 set campo1 = tab_test2.campo2 where
tab_test1.cod = tab_test2.cod;
UPDATE 1
targhettariodb=# select * from tab_test1;
cod | campo1
-----+---------
1 | valore3
(1 row)

I think the value it has chosen is random, isn't it?
So I can't have any control on it.

The UPDATE query above is semantically equivalent to this:
update tab_test1 set campo1 = (select campo2 from tab_test2, tab_test1
where tab_test1.cod = tab_test2.cod);
And this query(IMHO in a correct way) return an ERROR:
targhettariodb=# update tab_test1 set campo1 = (select campo2 from
tab_test2, tab_test1 where tab_test1.cod = tab_test2.cod);
ERROR: More than one tuple returned by a subselect used as an
expression.

Isn't this an incongruence in SQL?

Thanks,
Enrico.