mistake in sql99 compatibility?

Started by Christopher Kings-Lynneover 23 years ago6 messages
#1Christopher Kings-Lynne
chriskl@familyhealth.com.au

The cvs docs say that we support the 'WITH CHECK OPTION' on views, but the
TODO says we don't...

Chris

#2Bruce Momjian
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
In reply to: Christopher Kings-Lynne (#1)
Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

The cvs docs say that we support the 'WITH CHECK OPTION' on views, but the
TODO says we don't...

TODO updated. Not sure when it was added but I see it in SGML docs.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
#3Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#2)
Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

The cvs docs say that we support the 'WITH CHECK OPTION' on views, but the
TODO says we don't...

TODO updated. Not sure when it was added but I see it in SGML docs.

A moment's examination of gram.y would have convinced you that the
docs are wrong ...

regards, tom lane

#4Bruce Momjian
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
In reply to: Tom Lane (#3)
Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?

Tom Lane wrote:

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

The cvs docs say that we support the 'WITH CHECK OPTION' on views, but the
TODO says we don't...

TODO updated. Not sure when it was added but I see it in SGML docs.

A moment's examination of gram.y would have convinced you that the
docs are wrong ...

Oh, OK. In the future, the "A moment's examination" swipe isn't
required. :-( I suppose it makes you feel better.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
#5Noname
nconway@klamath.dyndns.org
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#2)
Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?

On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 02:57:27PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

The cvs docs say that we support the 'WITH CHECK OPTION' on views, but the
TODO says we don't...

TODO updated. Not sure when it was added but I see it in SGML docs.

On a related note, the SQL99 feature list in the development docs says
that we support the SQL99 UNIQUE predicate. AFAIK we don't -- should
the docs be updated?

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

#6Christopher Kings-Lynne
chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#2)
Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?

Sure? I don't see it. In fact, I only see it in the 'SQL92 features we
don't have section'.

http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-createview.html

Chris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 2:57 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] mistake in sql99 compatibility?

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

The cvs docs say that we support the 'WITH CHECK OPTION' on views, but

the

Show quoted text

TODO says we don't...

TODO updated. Not sure when it was added but I see it in SGML docs.

--
Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
+  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026