Broken acos in PL/PGSQL?

Started by pgsql-gen Newsgroupover 23 years ago2 messagesgeneral
Jump to latest
#1pgsql-gen Newsgroup
pgsql-gen@basebeans.com

Subject: [GENERAL] Broken acos in PL/PGSQL?
From: Milo Hyson <milo@cyberlifelabs.com>
===
I just ran into a show stopper exception on one of my systems. It seems the
acos() function in PL/PGSQL throws an exception if it's called with a 1. All
other acos() implementations I've ever used return a zero. I did some poking
around and every acos() reference I could find for other software returns a
zero. Is Postgres' implementation intentional or an oversight? In the context
of my application, zero is the correct value to return in this case.

--
Milo Hyson
CyberLife Labs, LLC

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

#2Darren Ferguson
darren@crystalballinc.com
In reply to: pgsql-gen Newsgroup (#1)
Re: Broken acos in PL/PGSQL?

Seems to work fine here

oss=> select acos(1);
acos
------
0
(1 row)

oss=> create function stest(integer) returns integer as '
oss'> declare
oss'> _num alias for $1;
oss'> begin
oss'> return acos(_num);
oss'> end;' language 'plpgsql';
CREATE
oss=> select stest(1);
stest
-------
0
(1 row)

Version information

oss=> select version();
version
-------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 7.2.1 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC 2.96
(1 row)

What version are you running???

On Mon, 5 Aug 2002, pgsql-gen Newsgroup wrote:

Subject: [GENERAL] Broken acos in PL/PGSQL?
From: Milo Hyson <milo@cyberlifelabs.com>
===
I just ran into a show stopper exception on one of my systems. It seems the
acos() function in PL/PGSQL throws an exception if it's called with a 1. All
other acos() implementations I've ever used return a zero. I did some poking
around and every acos() reference I could find for other software returns a
zero. Is Postgres' implementation intentional or an oversight? In the context
of my application, zero is the correct value to return in this case.

--
Darren Ferguson