cvs source doco

Started by Patrick Welcheover 23 years ago3 messagesgeneral
Jump to latest
#1Patrick Welche
prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk

Where's the source, Luke?

I remember that the modules moved, but where to?

"The requested URL /TODO/docs/cvs-tree.html was not found on this server."

and from /TODO/docs/cvs.html, I already have
% cat CVS/Root
:pserver:anoncvs@anoncvs.postgresql.org:/projects/cvsroot
% cvs update
? allroot
? contrib/spi/refint.so.pic
? contrib/spi/autoinc.so.pic
? src/test/regress/regress.so.pic
cvs server: Updating .
cvs server: cannot open directory /projects/cvsroot/pgsql: No such file or directory
...
so it must be explaining the way it used to be. (It does say 7.2 Documentation
at the top..)

Cheers,

Patrick

#2Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Patrick Welche (#1)
Re: cvs source doco

Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk> writes:

Where's the source, Luke?
I remember that the modules moved, but where to?

The CVS server address and other instructions didn't change, but you are
more or less forced to do a fresh checkout because Marc split the pgsql
module into pgsql-server and something else. Your existing CVS files
are pointing to the old modules and so "cvs update" will fail.

(If you have done a fresh checkout within the last month or two, then
this is wrong and some new theory is needed ... but that's my first
bet.)

regards, tom lane

#3Patrick Welche
prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk
In reply to: Tom Lane (#2)
Re: cvs source doco

On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 07:07:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk> writes:

Where's the source, Luke?
I remember that the modules moved, but where to?

The CVS server address and other instructions didn't change, but you are
more or less forced to do a fresh checkout because Marc split the pgsql
module into pgsql-server and something else. Your existing CVS files
are pointing to the old modules and so "cvs update" will fail.

(If you have done a fresh checkout within the last month or two, then
this is wrong and some new theory is needed ... but that's my first
bet.)

That must be a good bet. Thanks for the clarification!

Cheers,

Patrick