Rép. : Re: access time performance problem

Started by Erwan DUROSELLEover 23 years ago2 messagesgeneral
Jump to latest
#1Erwan DUROSELLE
EDuroselle@seafrance.fr

Just to be sure:

Could it be a checkpoint?
Checkpoint is supposed to flush all data to disks at regular intervals, isn't it?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Erwan DUROSELLE // SEAFRANCE DSI
Responsable Bases de Données // Databases Manager
Tel: +33 (0)1 55 31 59 70 // Fax: +33 (0)1 55 31 85 28
email: eduroselle@seafrance.fr
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com> 10/10/2002 17:34 >>>

On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Louis-Marie Croisez wrote:

Sorry, bad url:
use this instead:
http://louis.croisez.free.fr/capture1.jpg

I'm gonna make a guess here that it's WAL activity, or log activity.

So first off, are you saving postgresql's output to a log? if so, try
logging to a different drive than your data drive or turning off logging
for a quick test.

If it's WAL writes that are causing the problem, you can either try to
change the settings for commit_delay and commit_siblings or symlinking the
pg_xlog directory somewhere else. If you aren't sure how to do that,
don't learn how to on a live production server with real data.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)

#2Louis-Marie Croisez
louis-marie.croisez@etca.alcatel.be
In reply to: Erwan DUROSELLE (#1)
Re: access time performance problem

I have tried to modify checkpoint_to and checkpoint_segment, commit_delay and commit_sibblings parameters, but without any effect.
Touching the different postgres parameters, I was not able to influence the height of the peaks (see captures1.jpg), nor the delay
between the peaks.
I wonder if that peaks are independent from postgres or not ? I have executed bonnie++, good results as expected.
Should I upgrade my kernel to the last one (2.4.19), and/or install the last postgres version?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Erwan DUROSELLE" <EDuroselle@seafrance.fr>
To: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 5:58 PM
Subject: Rép. : Re: [GENERAL] access time performance problem

Just to be sure:

Could it be a checkpoint?
Checkpoint is supposed to flush all data to disks at regular intervals, isn't it?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Erwan DUROSELLE // SEAFRANCE DSI
Responsable Bases de Données // Databases Manager
Tel: +33 (0)1 55 31 59 70 // Fax: +33 (0)1 55 31 85 28
email: eduroselle@seafrance.fr
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com> 10/10/2002 17:34 >>>

On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Louis-Marie Croisez wrote:

Sorry, bad url:
use this instead:
http://louis.croisez.free.fr/capture1.jpg

I'm gonna make a guess here that it's WAL activity, or log activity.

So first off, are you saving postgresql's output to a log? if so, try
logging to a different drive than your data drive or turning off logging
for a quick test.

If it's WAL writes that are causing the problem, you can either try to
change the settings for commit_delay and commit_siblings or symlinking the
pg_xlog directory somewhere else. If you aren't sure how to do that,
don't learn how to on a live production server with real data.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html