removal from list

 --- Brickley Jeff-RA9607 <Jeff.Brickley@motorola.com>
wrote: > How can I get off this email list.  

unregister 'email address'

Came back with bogus errors!

______________________________________________________________________
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca

what sort of errors?

On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Xue-Feng Yang wrote:

the database (Berkeley DB is used) backend for the majordomo2 lists isn't
the most stable, so we've been having periodic corruption problems where
we have to rebuild it ... the problem is that the rebuild process doesn't
seem to be aware of unsubscribe/set commands that were issued *after* the
initial subscribe, so everyone gets back on ;(

If you are mis-configured, or on the list when you shouldn't be, please
re-unsubscribe and/or issue the set command, to get yourself back to the
format you were in ...

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, LN Cisneros wrote:

At 12:15 PM 3/13/2003 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

the database (Berkeley DB is used) backend for the majordomo2 lists isn't
the most stable, so we've been having periodic corruption problems where
we have to rebuild it

Does anyone else see the irony here?

How about using, oh say, PostgreSQL for the database? :-)

-crl
--
Chad R. Larson (CRL22) chad@eldocomp.com
Eldorado
Computing, Inc. 602-604-3100
5353 North 16th Street, Suite
400
Phoenix, Arizona 85016-3228

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Chad R. Larson wrote:

At 12:15 PM 3/13/2003 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

the database (Berkeley DB is used) backend for the majordomo2 lists isn't
the most stable, so we've been having periodic corruption problems where
we have to rebuild it

Does anyone else see the irony here?

How about using, oh say, PostgreSQL for the database? :-)

Do you volunteer to dive into the Majordomo2 code and extend it to use
PgSQL? i started, but time didn't allow me to get very far with it, but
if you have the time and wish to do so, I have commit access to the
repository to get the changes in place ...

--Le 13/03/2003 10:52 -0700, Chad R. Larson écrivait :

At 12:15 PM 3/13/2003 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

the database (Berkeley DB is used) backend for the majordomo2 lists
isn't the most stable, so we've been having periodic corruption
problems where we have to rebuild it

Does anyone else see the irony here?

How about using, oh say, PostgreSQL for the database? :-)

It's on it way.

--
Mathieu Arnold

--Le 13/03/2003 15:16 -0400, Marc G. Fournier écrivait :

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Chad R. Larson wrote:

At 12:15 PM 3/13/2003 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

the database (Berkeley DB is used) backend for the majordomo2 lists
isn't the most stable, so we've been having periodic corruption
problems where we have to rebuild it

Does anyone else see the irony here?

How about using, oh say, PostgreSQL for the database? :-)

Do you volunteer to dive into the Majordomo2 code and extend it to use
PgSQL? i started, but time didn't allow me to get very far with it, but
if you have the time and wish to do so, I have commit access to the
repository to get the changes in place ...

Did you have a look at what I committed to Mj::SimpleDB::SQL ?
I still have a few things to work out, and if you don't use sublists, you
can dive in, it works :)

--
Mathieu Arnold

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Mathieu Arnold wrote:

--Le 13/03/2003 15:16 -0400, Marc G. Fournier �crivait :

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Chad R. Larson wrote:

At 12:15 PM 3/13/2003 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

the database (Berkeley DB is used) backend for the majordomo2 lists
isn't the most stable, so we've been having periodic corruption
problems where we have to rebuild it

Does anyone else see the irony here?

How about using, oh say, PostgreSQL for the database? :-)

Do you volunteer to dive into the Majordomo2 code and extend it to use
PgSQL? i started, but time didn't allow me to get very far with it, but
if you have the time and wish to do so, I have commit access to the
repository to get the changes in place ...

Did you have a look at what I committed to Mj::SimpleDB::SQL ?
I still have a few things to work out, and if you don't use sublists, you
can dive in, it works :)

You feel confident enough for me to use it on these lists? :)

After a pg_dumpall > alldata how can I to restore?

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.445 / Virus Database: 250 - Release Date: 21/01/2003

--Le 13/03/2003 22:17 -0400, Marc G. Fournier écrivait :

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Mathieu Arnold wrote:

--Le 13/03/2003 15:16 -0400, Marc G. Fournier écrivait :

Do you volunteer to dive into the Majordomo2 code and extend it to use
PgSQL? i started, but time didn't allow me to get very far with it,
but if you have the time and wish to do so, I have commit access to the
repository to get the changes in place ...

Did you have a look at what I committed to Mj::SimpleDB::SQL ?
I still have a few things to work out, and if you don't use sublists, you
can dive in, it works :)

You feel confident enough for me to use it on these lists? :)

Well, as I said, it works perfectly well on my dev box if you don't use
sublist, because Mj2 use hard coded opendirs to find out if they exists.
(which is not always "the right way to do it" of course.) This does not
count the Xowners GLOBAL sublists which is not tested because it should
always exist :)
As I say, it works, but I would not want to be the end of postgresql.org
mailing lists in case there is a but somewhere :)

--
Mathieu Arnold

Christian Frabel wrote:

After a pg_dumpall > alldata how can I to restore?

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.445 / Virus Database: 250 - Release Date: 21/01/2003

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

psql -f alldata template1 postgres

--
Jean-Michel Chabanne
77450 MONTRY (FRANCE)
48" 54' N - 2" 49' E
Powered by Linux

Has anyone heard of clusgres or, better yet, had any experience with it?
I came across it while searching for active clustering projects.

http://www.linuxlabs.com/clusgres.html

Thanks in advance for the info!

Kris

On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 14:30, Kris Kiger wrote:

Has anyone heard of clusgres or, better yet, had any experience with it?
I came across it while searching for active clustering projects.

http://www.linuxlabs.com/clusgres.html

Thanks in advance for the info!

I have heard of it but I've not heard of any reports on these lists of
how well it works. If you (or anyone else) gives it a spin please try to
post an account to the list and/or if you send me the info it could
probably make its way on to techdocs.

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

Robert,

I am currently evaluating PolyServe Matrix Server which is a clustering
solution including a clustered file system (mounted read-write
everywhere).

Anything special anyone wants to know? I'm using PostgreSQL 7.4.2 in
a Linux cluster.

Greg

Robert Treat wrote:

On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 14:30, Kris Kiger wrote:

Has anyone heard of clusgres or, better yet, had any experience with it?
I came across it while searching for active clustering projects.

http://www.linuxlabs.com/clusgres.html

Thanks in advance for the info!

I have heard of it but I've not heard of any reports on these lists of
how well it works. If you (or anyone else) gives it a spin please try to
post an account to the list and/or if you send me the info it could
probably make its way on to techdocs.

Robert Treat

--
Greg Spiegelberg
Product Development Manager
Cranel, Incorporated.
Phone: 614.318.4314
Fax: 614.431.8388
Email: gspiegelberg@cranel.com
Technology. Integrity. Focus. V-Solve!

Do you mean that you are actually testing this product now? If so,
what's the hardware configuration (nodes, storage server, interconnects)
that you are using?

Warmest regards, 
Ericson Smith
Tracking Specialist/DBA
+-----------------------+-----------------------------------------+
| http://www.did-it.com | "3 Years ago I was worth $5M on paper!" |
| eric@did-it.com       | "Sweet! Can I have fries with that?"    |
| 516-255-0500          |                          - Tom Tomorrow |
+-----------------------+-----------------------------------------+ 

Greg Spiegelberg wrote:

2 dual PIII-1.4GHz Linux RedHat 3.0 servers each with onboard AIC7xxx
and 2 U160 drives (mirrored), 2 GB of ECC memory, 2 onboard Intel Ether
Pro 100Mbps type NIC's, 1 Qlogic 2310 HBA on a 1GBs SAN using a Candera
510 storage cluster with Xyratex SATA on the backend configured with 1+0
LUN's. It will be using a private network and a small disk on the SAN
as the interconnect.

Once I have it running and I've run the necessary tests for myself
I could run a few tests for anyone else who is interested. Deadline
is June 18th when either I scrap it and try a different solution or
we have to buy in which case I'll need it for our production databases.
Below is the config I intend to use for PostgreSQL 7.4.2.

Greg

PostgreSQL 7.4.2 config & compile
configure \
--prefix=/psfs1/apps/pgsql-7.4.2 \
--enable-thread-safety \
--enable-largefiles \
--enable-odbc \
--enable-multibyte \
--enable-shared \
--enable-syslog \
--with-perl \
--with-CXX \
--with-pam \
--with-maxbackends=128 \
--with-tcl \
--with-readline \
--with-zlib
make -j 2 CPPFLAGS="-O3 -DALLOW_ABSOLUTE_DBPATHS -DLOCK_DEBUG" all

Ericson Smith wrote:

Do you mean that you are actually testing this product now? If so,
what's the hardware configuration (nodes, storage server, interconnects)
that you are using?

Warmest regards, Ericson Smith
Tracking Specialist/DBA
+-----------------------+-----------------------------------------+
| http://www.did-it.com | "3 Years ago I was worth $5M on paper!" |
| eric@did-it.com       | "Sweet! Can I have fries with that?"    |
| 516-255-0500          |                          - Tom Tomorrow |
+-----------------------+-----------------------------------------+

Greg Spiegelberg wrote:

Robert,

I am currently evaluating PolyServe Matrix Server which is a clustering
solution including a clustered file system (mounted read-write
everywhere).

Anything special anyone wants to know? I'm using PostgreSQL 7.4.2 in
a Linux cluster.

Greg

Robert Treat wrote:

On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 14:30, Kris Kiger wrote:

Has anyone heard of clusgres or, better yet, had any experience with
it? I came across it while searching for active clustering projects.

http://www.linuxlabs.com/clusgres.html

Thanks in advance for the info!

I have heard of it but I've not heard of any reports on these lists of
how well it works. If you (or anyone else) gives it a spin please try to
post an account to the list and/or if you send me the info it could
probably make its way on to techdocs.
Robert Treat

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

--
Greg Spiegelberg
Product Development Manager
Cranel, Incorporated.
Phone: 614.318.4314
Fax: 614.431.8388
Email: gspiegelberg@cranel.com
Technology. Integrity. Focus. V-Solve!

We'd be very interested in the performance, especially with the disk
being used as in interconnect (I assume that that is being used to
simulate global shared memory?)

We did have a talk with the folks over at http://www.linuxlabs.com/clustgres

They were honest enough to say that even with the Dolphon interconnects, that writing would be slower than usual. We have not made a complete decision on that yet, but are still looking at alternatives.

It seems that Clustres might be a good solution. They use a SAN, the Dolphin interconnects, and multiple diskless nodes. In theory I am sure it works, but this is one of the chicken/egg problems where we want to see it in general use first before committing :-)

- Ericson

Greg Spiegelberg wrote:

Some basics on how easy it is to install/configure and some before/after type
benchmarks showing how it affected performance. Perferrably you could
measure simple vs. complex queries as well as update vs. insert performance.
If you're really ambitious you could try running one of the tpc style
benchmarks on the system, check the archives or the osdl site for more info
on getting these up and running.

Robert Treat

On Monday 24 May 2004 09:59, Greg Spiegelberg wrote:

Robert,

I am currently evaluating PolyServe Matrix Server which is a clustering
solution including a clustered file system (mounted read-write
everywhere).

Anything special anyone wants to know? I'm using PostgreSQL 7.4.2 in
a Linux cluster.

Greg

Robert Treat wrote:

On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 14:30, Kris Kiger wrote:

Has anyone heard of clusgres or, better yet, had any experience with it?
I came across it while searching for active clustering projects.

http://www.linuxlabs.com/clusgres.html

Thanks in advance for the info!

I have heard of it but I've not heard of any reports on these lists of
how well it works. If you (or anyone else) gives it a spin please try to
post an account to the list and/or if you send me the info it could
probably make its way on to techdocs.

Robert Treat

--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL