Avoiding duplications in table.

Started by Deepa Kabout 23 years ago2 messagesgeneral
Jump to latest
#1Deepa K
kdeepa@midascomm.com

Hi All,
I have the following tables.

tablename : versions tablename :
applicationmanager tablename : applications

versionnumber-string versionnumber -
string applicationnumber - integer

applicationnumber - integer other details

tablename : profilemanager tablename : profiles

versionnumber : string versionnumber : string
profilename : string profilename : string

applicationnumber : integer
otherdetails

Primary key :
---------------

(1) versions : versionnumber
(2) applicationmanager : versionnumber, applicationnumber
(3) applications : applicationnumber
(4) profilemanager : veriosnnumber, profilename, applicationnumber
(5) profiles : versionnumber, profilename

Relations :
-----------

(1) versionnumber of 'applicationmanager' referes to versionnumber of
'versions' table.
(2) applicationnumber of 'applicationmanager' referes to
applicationnumber of 'applications' table.
(3) versionnumber and applicationnumber of 'profilemanager' referes
to versionnumber and applicationnumber of 'applicationmanager'.
(4) versionnumber and profilename of 'profilemanager' referes ot
versionnumber and profilename of 'profiles'.
(5) versionnumber of 'profiles' referes to versionnumber of
'versions'.

In the above design I can able to see duplication of data in all the
tables. If I take out a id out of all these tables to make reference, is
that problem will solve. Is that is
a correct approach.

Can any one help me.

regards,
Deepa K

#2Dennis Gearon
gearond@cvc.net
In reply to: Deepa K (#1)
Re: Avoiding duplications in table.

For us not to struggle to read what you are doing,
please reformat your table definitions along the lines of:

tablename1
column_name1, type
column name2, type
column name3, type

tablename1
column name1, type
column name2, type
column name3, type

or

full fledged table creation statements a la:

CREATE TABLE PhonNums(
phone_num_id serial NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
phon_num varchar(32) NOT NULL UNIQUE,
created timestamp DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP NOT NULL
);

PS one of the recommended ways to name attributes in a database design are:

Schemas 'ALL_CAPS_SEPARATED_WORDS' (this is a guess)
TableNames 'BumpyCaps'
FieldNames 'lower_case_underscore_separated_words'
SQLWords 'SHOULD BE ALL CAPS'
Keys/Indexes 'Often_Are_Found_With_Leading_Caps_And_Underscores'
Functions 'One_leading_cap_with_underscores' - i really don't know

Of course, PGSQL and other databases will change some of those to all caps or
all lowercase. But for readability, naming db attributes this way in SQL
statements and functions etc, helps a lot.

Deepa K wrote:

Show quoted text

Hi All,
I have the following tables.

tablename : versions tablename :
applicationmanager tablename : applications

versionnumber-string versionnumber -
string applicationnumber - integer

applicationnumber - integer other details

tablename : profilemanager tablename : profiles

versionnumber : string versionnumber : string
profilename : string profilename : string

applicationnumber : integer
otherdetails

Primary key :
---------------

(1) versions : versionnumber
(2) applicationmanager : versionnumber, applicationnumber
(3) applications : applicationnumber
(4) profilemanager : veriosnnumber, profilename, applicationnumber
(5) profiles : versionnumber, profilename

Relations :
-----------

(1) versionnumber of 'applicationmanager' referes to versionnumber of
'versions' table.
(2) applicationnumber of 'applicationmanager' referes to
applicationnumber of 'applications' table.
(3) versionnumber and applicationnumber of 'profilemanager' referes
to versionnumber and applicationnumber of 'applicationmanager'.
(4) versionnumber and profilename of 'profilemanager' referes ot
versionnumber and profilename of 'profiles'.
(5) versionnumber of 'profiles' referes to versionnumber of
'versions'.

In the above design I can able to see duplication of data in all the
tables. If I take out a id out of all these tables to make reference, is
that problem will solve. Is that is
a correct approach.

Can any one help me.

regards,
Deepa K

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster