new mail server for PGSQL-GENERAL ?

Started by Phil Howardalmost 23 years ago3 messagesgeneral
Jump to latest
#1Phil Howard
phil-pgsql-general@ipal.net

Did the PGSQL-GENERAL move to a new mail server? I whitelisted
the domain, but now that does no good because someone forgot to
set up the reverse DNS on the new servers. Are these the correct
addresses now: 64.117.224.193 and 64.117.225.159

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| Phil Howard - KA9WGN | Dallas | http://linuxhomepage.com/ |
| phil-nospam@ipal.net | Texas, USA | http://ka9wgn.ham.org/ |
-----------------------------------------------------------------

#2The Hermit Hacker
scrappy@hub.org
In reply to: Phil Howard (#1)
Re: new mail server for PGSQL-GENERAL ?

expect it to be any IP within the range of:

64.117.224.130 -> 254
64.117.255.130 -> 254

we've been frantic on getting the VMs setup and debugged, the reverse DNS
has been taking second fiddle ... will get that straightened out next ...

On Tue, 20 May 2003, Phil Howard wrote:

Did the PGSQL-GENERAL move to a new mail server? I whitelisted
the domain, but now that does no good because someone forgot to
set up the reverse DNS on the new servers. Are these the correct
addresses now: 64.117.224.193 and 64.117.225.159

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| Phil Howard - KA9WGN | Dallas | http://linuxhomepage.com/ |
| phil-nospam@ipal.net | Texas, USA | http://ka9wgn.ham.org/ |
-----------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org

#3Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: The Hermit Hacker (#2)
Re: new mail server for PGSQL-GENERAL ?

The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:

expect it to be any IP within the range of:
64.117.224.130 -> 254
64.117.255.130 -> 254

Shouldn't that second line be 64.117.225.*?

regards, tom lane