many columns with references to one table
Hi,
What is the problem with the following table declaration?
CREATE TABLE persons (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
name TEXT NOT NULL,
bdate DATE,
address INTEGER REFERENCES addresses,
phonepriv INTEGER REFERENCES phones,
phoneday INTEGER REFERENCES phones,
phonemobil INTEGER REFERENCES phones,
email INTEGER REFERENCES emails,
mate INTEGER REFERENCES persons,
updated DATE NOT NULL
);
My problem is that the references to the phones table do not get
restricted, i.e. I can insert any value in the phone*-fields, while the
references to the other tables are restricted to values that allready
exists. The table declaration of phones should be all right, it has a
primary key defined like every other tables I have. Is there a
restriciton that no more then 1 column may reference an other table?
Regards
Andreas Fromm
Andreas Fromm <Andreas.Fromm@physik.uni-erlangen.de> writes:
My problem is that the references to the phones table do not get
restricted, i.e. I can insert any value in the phone*-fields, while the
references to the other tables are restricted to values that allready
exists.
Hard to believe --- and I couldn't reproduce it here. What PG version
are you using? Can you show us a complete example?
regards, tom lane
You haven't given the table/column that it references, just the column I
assume.
Andreas Fromm wrote:
Show quoted text
Hi,
What is the problem with the following table declaration?
CREATE TABLE persons (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
name TEXT NOT NULL,
bdate DATE,
address INTEGER REFERENCES addresses,
phonepriv INTEGER REFERENCES phones,
phoneday INTEGER REFERENCES phones,
phonemobil INTEGER REFERENCES phones,
email INTEGER REFERENCES emails,
mate INTEGER REFERENCES persons,
updated DATE NOT NULL
);My problem is that the references to the phones table do not get
restricted, i.e. I can insert any value in the phone*-fields, while
the references to the other tables are restricted to values that
allready exists. The table declaration of phones should be all right,
it has a primary key defined like every other tables I have. Is there
a restriciton that no more then 1 column may reference an other table?Regards
Andreas Fromm
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
Tom Lane wrote:
Andreas Fromm <Andreas.Fromm@physik.uni-erlangen.de> writes:
My problem is that the references to the phones table do not get
restricted, i.e. I can insert any value in the phone*-fields, while the
references to the other tables are restricted to values that allready
exists.Hard to believe --- and I couldn't reproduce it here. What PG version
are you using? Can you show us a complete example?regards, tom lane
Well, the demonstration effect...
After a complete rewrite of my Database-generating sql-file the problem
is solved. Don't know what I did wrong the first time, but it's working
now. The curious thing is that I didn't made anything different in this
part.
Thanks
Andreas
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Andreas Fromm wrote:
Hi,
What is the problem with the following table declaration?
CREATE TABLE persons (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
name TEXT NOT NULL,
bdate DATE,
address INTEGER REFERENCES addresses,
phonepriv INTEGER REFERENCES phones,
phoneday INTEGER REFERENCES phones,
phonemobil INTEGER REFERENCES phones,
email INTEGER REFERENCES emails,
mate INTEGER REFERENCES persons,
updated DATE NOT NULL
);My problem is that the references to the phones table do not get
restricted, i.e. I can insert any value in the phone*-fields, while the
references to the other tables are restricted to values that allready
exists. The table declaration of phones should be all right, it has a
primary key defined like every other tables I have. Is there a
restriciton that no more then 1 column may reference an other table?
Not as far as I know (and I've done multiple references to the same table
in the pash) with the exception that versions before either 7.3 or 7.2 are
going to have problems with referential actions other than NO ACTION in
such cases.
Can you make a complete standalone example?