C functions quicker than Plpgsql?

Started by Martin Hartover 22 years ago2 messagesgeneral
Jump to latest
#1Martin Hart
martin@zsdfherg.com

Hi all,

Given a stored procedure that runs entirely within the database (e.g. loop
through a few rows of table A, apply "some function" and create a few rows in
table B) - I am wondering what the performance benefits are of implementing
such a
function in C using the SPI vs plpgsql.

Obviously if "some function" is fairly involved then there may be an
advantage by coding it in C - but if it isn't will the C function
still execute faster?

as an unrealistic simple example...

create function test() returns void as '
declare
r record;
begin
for r in select * from table_a where x > 500 loop
insert into table_b (id) values (a.id);
end loop;
return;
end;
' language plpgsql;

now if i write it in C instead, what do i gain performance-wise?

thanks for any light you can shed on this...

Cheers,
Martin

#2Peter Eisentraut
peter_e@gmx.net
In reply to: Martin Hart (#1)
Re: C functions quicker than Plpgsql?

Martin Hart writes:

I am wondering what the performance benefits are of implementing such a
function in C using the SPI vs plpgsql.

plpgsql is itself implemented in C using SPI. So you do the math.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net