tsearch2 and gist index bloat
I have installed tsearch2 and have noticed that the gist index used to do searches grows and grows
as I update rows, delete rows, or run VACUUM FULL ANALYZE. Below are some details:
PostgreSQL 7.4RC1
Red Hat 9
Table "public.series"
Column | Type | Modifiers
---------------+-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------
id | integer | not null default nextval('public.series_id_seq'::text)
database | character varying | not null
name | character varying | not null
description | character varying |
documentation | character varying |
ts_vec | tsvector |
Indexes:
"series_pkey" primary key, btree (id)
"series_db_name_un" unique, btree ("database", name)
"ts_in" gist (ts_vec)
Triggers:
ts_update BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE ON series FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE tsearch2('ts_vec',
'description', 'documentation')
There are 110,873 rows in this table and 13398 unique words indexed by ts_in. Using oid2name, I
monitored the size of the index ts_in as I performed different operations:
154 MB After the index was created.
190 MB After updating 40,422 rows.
243 MB After VACUUM FULL
275 MB After deleting 40,422 rows & again VACUUM FULL
Below is some output from VACUUM FULL ANALYZE VERBOSE after the 40,422 rows were deleted.
INFO: index "ts_in" now contains 70451 row versions in 2969 pages
DETAIL: 40422 index row versions were removed.
0 index pages have been deleted, 0 are currently reusable.
CPU 0.27s/0.44u sec elapsed 1.03 sec.
As the index size grows, search performance slows to a crawl because it's too to fit in RAM. Is
the only solution to drop and recreate the index after large updates?
Thanks,
George Essig
--- George Essig <george_essig@yahoo.com> wrote:
I have installed tsearch2 and have noticed that the gist index used to do searches grows and
grows
as I update rows, delete rows, or run VACUUM FULL ANALYZE. Below are some details:
....
There are 110,873 rows in this table and 13398 unique words indexed by ts_in. Using oid2name, I
monitored the size of the index ts_in as I performed different operations:154 MB After the index was created.
190 MB After updating 40,422 rows.
243 MB After VACUUM FULL
275 MB After deleting 40,422 rows & again VACUUM FULL
Sorry, I mis-reported the index sizes. They are about 1/10 the size:
15 MB After the index was created.
19 MB After updating 40,422 rows.
24 MB After VACUUM FULL
27 MB After deleting 40,422 rows & again VACUUM FULL
I still have a problem that the index size grows and grows and eventually searches slow to a
crawl.
George Essig
Import Notes
Resolved by subject fallback
Hello,
I don't know if you can do this with a gist index but try using the
REINDEX command.
J
George Essig wrote:
Show quoted text
--- George Essig <george_essig@yahoo.com> wrote:I have installed tsearch2 and have noticed that the gist index used to do searches grows and
grows
as I update rows, delete rows, or run VACUUM FULL ANALYZE. Below are some details:....
There are 110,873 rows in this table and 13398 unique words indexed by ts_in. Using oid2name, I
monitored the size of the index ts_in as I performed different operations:154 MB After the index was created.
190 MB After updating 40,422 rows.
243 MB After VACUUM FULL
275 MB After deleting 40,422 rows & again VACUUM FULLSorry, I mis-reported the index sizes. They are about 1/10 the size:
15 MB After the index was created.
19 MB After updating 40,422 rows.
24 MB After VACUUM FULL
27 MB After deleting 40,422 rows & again VACUUM FULLI still have a problem that the index size grows and grows and eventually searches slow to a
crawl.George Essig
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Thanks for the reply. For this project, I can update the data and reindex during off-peak hours.
I was just surprised to see the size of the index double after heavy write activity.
George Essig
--- "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
Show quoted text
Hello,
I don't know if you can do this with a gist index but try using the
REINDEX command.J
George Essig wrote:
--- George Essig <george_essig@yahoo.com> wrote:I have installed tsearch2 and have noticed that the gist index used to do searches grows and
grows
as I update rows, delete rows, or run VACUUM FULL ANALYZE. Below are some details:....
There are 110,873 rows in this table and 13398 unique words indexed by ts_in. Using oid2name,
I
monitored the size of the index ts_in as I performed different operations:
154 MB After the index was created.
190 MB After updating 40,422 rows.
243 MB After VACUUM FULL
275 MB After deleting 40,422 rows & again VACUUM FULLSorry, I mis-reported the index sizes. They are about 1/10 the size:
15 MB After the index was created.
19 MB After updating 40,422 rows.
24 MB After VACUUM FULL
27 MB After deleting 40,422 rows & again VACUUM FULLI still have a problem that the index size grows and grows and eventually searches slow to a
crawl.George Essig
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, George Essig wrote:
Thanks for the reply. For this project, I can update the data and reindex during off-peak hours.
I was just surprised to see the size of the index double after heavy write activity.
This is not tsearch specific problem. It was discussed several times, ]
see index bloat subject in archives.
Oleg
George Essig
--- "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:Hello,
I don't know if you can do this with a gist index but try using the
REINDEX command.J
George Essig wrote:
--- George Essig <george_essig@yahoo.com> wrote:I have installed tsearch2 and have noticed that the gist index used to do searches grows and
grows
as I update rows, delete rows, or run VACUUM FULL ANALYZE. Below are some details:....
There are 110,873 rows in this table and 13398 unique words indexed by ts_in. Using oid2name,
I
monitored the size of the index ts_in as I performed different operations:
154 MB After the index was created.
190 MB After updating 40,422 rows.
243 MB After VACUUM FULL
275 MB After deleting 40,422 rows & again VACUUM FULLSorry, I mis-reported the index sizes. They are about 1/10 the size:
15 MB After the index was created.
19 MB After updating 40,422 rows.
24 MB After VACUUM FULL
27 MB After deleting 40,422 rows & again VACUUM FULLI still have a problem that the index size grows and grows and eventually searches slow to a
crawl.George Essig
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
--- Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> wrote:
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, George Essig wrote:
Thanks for the reply. For this project, I can update the data and reindex during off-peak
hours.
I was just surprised to see the size of the index double after heavy write activity.
This is not tsearch specific problem. It was discussed several times, ]
see index bloat subject in archives.Oleg
I understand that index bloat is a general problem, but is this particular problem more severe
because of a gist index? By the way, I'm running PostgreSQL 7.4 Release Candidate 1.
Thanks,
George Essig