Psql bug?

Started by Francisco Reyesover 22 years ago4 messagesgeneral
Jump to latest
#1Francisco Reyes
lists@natserv.com

Compiled PostgreSQL with gettext support.
Table name completion works for \d <table initials>, but doesn't for \d+
<table initials>.

Is this considered a bug? (even if a very minor one at that..).

#2Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Francisco Reyes (#1)
Re: Psql bug?

Francisco Reyes <lists@natserv.com> writes:

Compiled PostgreSQL with gettext support.
Table name completion works for \d <table initials>, but doesn't for \d+
<table initials>.

Works fine for me ...

regards, tom lane

#3Francisco Reyes
lists@natserv.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#2)
Re: Psql bug?

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

Francisco Reyes <lists@natserv.com> writes:

Compiled PostgreSQL with gettext support.
Table name completion works for \d <table initials>, but doesn't for \d+
<table initials>.

Works fine for me ...

On a 7.3.4 release Psql?
I was trying first on a 7.3.4 built from ports on FreeBSD.
Just tried a Suse Linux machine that I have access to. Postgres was built
from sources there and I see the same behavior.

For example I have a table called phones
\d ph <tab>
completes name to phones but,

\d+ ph <tab> doesn't complete name.

#4Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Francisco Reyes (#3)
Re: Psql bug?

Francisco Reyes <lists@natserv.com> writes:

Table name completion works for \d <table initials>, but doesn't for \d+
<table initials>.

Works fine for me ...

On a 7.3.4 release Psql?

Oh, I was testing 7.4.

regards, tom lane