order by is ambiguous
I could not find any discussion on this but imho this seems an erroneous
error occuring now in 7.3.4 (after upgrade from 7.2.3):
select null::time, 'test'::varchar as time order by time;
ERROR: ORDER BY 'time' is ambiguous
The solution is to name the time datatype e.g.
select null::time as xyz, 'test'::varchar as time order by time;
Regards,
Alfred
Travel Jadoo <jadoo@xs4all.nl> writes:
I could not find any discussion on this but imho this seems an erroneous
error occuring now in 7.3.4 (after upgrade from 7.2.3):
select null::time, 'test'::varchar as time order by time;
ERROR: ORDER BY 'time' is ambiguous
What's erroneous about it? You have two output columns named 'time'.
regards, tom lane
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 16:09, Tom Lane wrote:
Travel Jadoo <jadoo@xs4all.nl> writes:
I could not find any discussion on this but imho this seems an erroneous
error occuring now in 7.3.4 (after upgrade from 7.2.3):select null::time, 'test'::varchar as time order by time;
ERROR: ORDER BY 'time' is ambiguousWhat's erroneous about it? You have two output columns named 'time'.
regards, tom lane
Hmm but the first one has actually no name, it's just casted as datatype
time. I now realise that casted columns get assigned the datatype as
name. Should it not show ?column? as output just like you a "select
null;" would do?
This actually came up as I have multiple time fields but only one was
named time by me.
Regards,
Alfred
Hmm but the first one has actually no name, it's just casted as datatype
time. I now realise that casted columns get assigned the datatype as
name. Should it not show ?column? as output just like you a "select
null;" would do?
i think you're confusing what the front end uses as a default column
heading with what the back end uses as a default column name. '?column?'
would probably not meet SQL standards.
--
Mike Nolan