Re: Functions in CHECK constraint not getting dumped before

Started by Rajesh Kumar Mallahabout 22 years ago6 messagesgeneral
Jump to latest
#1Rajesh Kumar Mallah
mallah@trade-india.com

Tom Lane wrote:

It is found that pg_dump does not dump function referred in CHECK
constraint definations before dumping the table defination . As a result
the tables
do not get restored due to lack of defined functions.

Is it something that will be worked upon in future ?

This is fixed in CVS tip.

Yes it did solve that problem.
another problem that i am facing is during pg_dump i get warning
like:

pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "txtidx_in" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "txtidx_out" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "qtxt_in" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "qtxt_out" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "mqtxt_in" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_in" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_out" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_consistent" appears to be
invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_compress" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_decompress" appears to be
invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_penalty" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_picksplit" appears to be
invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_union" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_same" appears to be invalid

And in the dump there are lines like:

REVOKE ALL ON FUNCTION txtidx_in(opaque) FROM PUBLIC;
REVOKE ALL ON FUNCTION txtidx_in(opaque) FROM "";
*SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION "103"; <---------------------------------*
GRANT ALL ON FUNCTION txtidx_in(opaque) TO PUBLIC;
RESET SESSION AUTHORIZATION;

can you pls tell me how to get rid of the warnings and the invalid
id "103" in pg_proc i dont see any reference to SYSID 103
in the columns proowner or the acl columns.

Any other places where i should look?

Regds
Mallah.

Show quoted text

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

#2Rajesh Kumar Mallah
mallah@trade-india.com
In reply to: Rajesh Kumar Mallah (#1)

Rajesh Kumar Mallah wrote:

Tom Lane wrote:

It is found that pg_dump does not dump function referred in CHECK
constraint definations before dumping the table defination . As a result
the tables
do not get restored due to lack of defined functions.

Is it something that will be worked upon in future ?

This is fixed in CVS tip.

Yes it did solve that problem.
another problem that i am facing is during pg_dump i get warning
like:

This problem was also solved . The problem was that the corruption
was in template1 and i was looking at a different database.

i finally reset the template1 by using methods described in

Adventures in PostgreSQL
Episode 1: Restoring a Corrupted Template1 using Template0 , May 2002
Josh Berkus.

Regds
mallah.

Show quoted text

pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "txtidx_in" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "txtidx_out" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "qtxt_in" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "qtxt_out" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "mqtxt_in" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_in" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_out" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_consistent" appears to be
invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_compress" appears to be
invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_decompress" appears to be
invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_penalty" appears to be
invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_picksplit" appears to be
invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_union" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_same" appears to be invalid

And in the dump there are lines like:

REVOKE ALL ON FUNCTION txtidx_in(opaque) FROM PUBLIC;
REVOKE ALL ON FUNCTION txtidx_in(opaque) FROM "";
*SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION "103"; <---------------------------------*
GRANT ALL ON FUNCTION txtidx_in(opaque) TO PUBLIC;
RESET SESSION AUTHORIZATION;

can you pls tell me how to get rid of the warnings and the invalid
id "103" in pg_proc i dont see any reference to SYSID 103
in the columns proowner or the acl columns.

Any other places where i should look?

Regds
Mallah.

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

#3Rajesh Kumar Mallah
mallah@trade-india.com
In reply to: Rajesh Kumar Mallah (#2)

Greetings!

The only issue that i noticed now with pg_dump version 7.5dev
is that create schemas are not dumped before user definations.
which have their search_path set by ALTER USER command.

eg

ALTER USER arvind SET search_path TO 'erp';
ERROR: schema "erp" does not exist

This is relatively harmless to me at least,
but the point is to have pg_dump work without requiring
any manual editing of the dumpfiles :)

Regds
Mallah.

Rajesh Kumar Mallah wrote:

Show quoted text

Rajesh Kumar Mallah wrote:

Tom Lane wrote:

It is found that pg_dump does not dump function referred in CHECK
constraint definations before dumping the table defination . As a
result the tables
do not get restored due to lack of defined functions.

Is it something that will be worked upon in future ?

This is fixed in CVS tip.

Yes it did solve that problem.
another problem that i am facing is during pg_dump i get warning
like:

This problem was also solved . The problem was that the corruption
was in template1 and i was looking at a different database.

i finally reset the template1 by using methods described in

Adventures in PostgreSQL
Episode 1: Restoring a Corrupted Template1 using Template0 , May 2002
Josh Berkus.

Regds
mallah.

pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "txtidx_in" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "txtidx_out" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "qtxt_in" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "qtxt_out" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "mqtxt_in" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_in" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_out" appears to be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_consistent" appears to
be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_compress" appears to be
invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_decompress" appears to
be invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_penalty" appears to be
invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_picksplit" appears to be
invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_union" appears to be
invalid
pg_dump: WARNING: owner of function "gtxtidx_same" appears to be invalid

And in the dump there are lines like:

REVOKE ALL ON FUNCTION txtidx_in(opaque) FROM PUBLIC;
REVOKE ALL ON FUNCTION txtidx_in(opaque) FROM "";
*SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION "103"; <---------------------------------*
GRANT ALL ON FUNCTION txtidx_in(opaque) TO PUBLIC;
RESET SESSION AUTHORIZATION;

can you pls tell me how to get rid of the warnings and the invalid
id "103" in pg_proc i dont see any reference to SYSID 103
in the columns proowner or the acl columns.

Any other places where i should look?

Regds
Mallah.

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)

#4Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Rajesh Kumar Mallah (#3)

Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah@trade-india.com> writes:

The only issue that i noticed now with pg_dump version 7.5dev
is that create schemas are not dumped before user definations.
which have their search_path set by ALTER USER command.

"dev" how far back? I thought we fixed that a little while ago.
I get a notice not an error:

regression=# create user arvind;
CREATE USER
regression=# ALTER USER arvind SET search_path TO 'erp';
NOTICE: schema "erp" does not exist
ALTER USER
regression=#

regards, tom lane

#5Rajesh Kumar Mallah
mallah@trade-india.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#4)

yesterdays' lemme do a cvs update :)

regds
mallah.

Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah@trade-india.com> writes:

The only issue that i noticed now with pg_dump version 7.5dev
is that create schemas are not dumped before user definations.
which have their search_path set by ALTER USER command.

"dev" how far back? I thought we fixed that a little while ago.
I get a notice not an error:

regression=# create user arvind;
CREATE USER
regression=# ALTER USER arvind SET search_path TO 'erp';
NOTICE: schema "erp" does not exist
ALTER USER
regression=#

regards, tom lane

-----------------------------------------
Over 1,00,000 exporters are waiting for your order! Click below to get
in touch with leading Indian exporters listed in the premier
trade directory Exporters Yellow Pages.
http://www.trade-india.com/dyn/gdh/eyp/

#6Rajesh Kumar Mallah
mallah@trade-india.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#4)

Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah@trade-india.com> writes:

The only issue that i noticed now with pg_dump version 7.5dev
is that create schemas are not dumped before user definations.
which have their search_path set by ALTER USER command.

"dev" how far back? I thought we fixed that a little while ago.
I get a notice not an error:

Actually my frontend is 7.5dev but the server is 7.4.1
so its fine i guess.

Regds
Mallah.

regression=# create user arvind;
CREATE USER
regression=# ALTER USER arvind SET search_path TO 'erp';
NOTICE: schema "erp" does not exist
ALTER USER
regression=#

regards, tom lane

-----------------------------------------
Over 1,00,000 exporters are waiting for your order! Click below to get
in touch with leading Indian exporters listed in the premier
trade directory Exporters Yellow Pages.
http://www.trade-india.com/dyn/gdh/eyp/